Barium Chemtrails
Executive Summary:
- Samples of water were collected in August 2007, in Stamps Arkansas, by leaving some bowls outside for a month
- The resultant dirty water was tested by KSLA and was found to have the same amount of barium in it as most municipal tap water.
- The reporter misunderstood the results, and said there was a lot of Barium
Some conspiracy theorists think that persistent spreading contrails indicate some kind of deliberate aerial spraying, probably by the government. They speculate as to what could be in these trails, and one of the most common things they claim is barium.
Some people are so obsessed by this idea that they have rainwater tested to see if it has barium in it. They usually find some, and then trumpet this as evidence that their theory is correct.
Unfortunately they are wrong. I’ll explain why, but first, some basic science.
What is Barium?
Barium is a metal, like calcium. You never find it in its metal form (outside of a lab), as it oxidizes rapidly in the air. Instead you’ll find compounds, usually barium sulfate or barium carbonate. Barium compounds are used in the plastics, rubber, electronics and textile industries, in ceramic glazes and enamels, in glass-making, brick-making and paper-making, as a lubricant additive, in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, in case-hardening of steel and in the oil and gas industry as a wetting agent for drilling mud. Barium in water comes primarily from natural sources as it is present as a trace element in both igneous and sedimentary rocks. Barium is generally present in air in particulate form as a result of industrial emissions, particularly from combustion of coal and diesel oil and waste incineration.
µ and Parts Per …
When you measure the concentration of a substance in water, you can express it in various ways. You have to pay attention to units when converting from one way to another.
A liter of water weighs 1 kilogram, which is 1000 grams.
A milligram is 1/1000th (a thousandth) of a gram. 1mg = 1 milligram = 0.001g
A microgram is 1/1000000 (a millionth) of a gram. 1ug = 1µg = 1 microgram
Note that last line, because it’s important. The symbol µ is the greek letter “mu”. In measuring, it’s used to mean “micro”, or “millionth”. (To type µ, hold down the Alt key, type 230 on the numeric keypad, and then release the Alt key). Since it’s difficult to type, it’s often written using the letter “u”. Make sure you understand the difference between a milligram (mg, 1/1000th or a gram) and a microgram (µg, ug, 1/1000000th of a gram). A milligram is thousandth, not a millionth. It’s a little confusing sometimes.
A microgram is a millionth of a gram, so it’s a billionth of a kilogram. Since there are 1000 grams in a kilogram, and 1,000,000 micrograms in a gram, there are 1,000,000,000 µg in a kilogram. All this is basic high school science.
Concentration in water is measured as ppm, ppb, g/L, mg/L, µg/L. These are parts per million, parts per billion, grams per liter, milligrams per liter and micrograms per liter. We can convert between these easily:
1 ppm = 1 mg/L = 1000 ppb = 1000 µg/L
1 ppb = 1 µg/L = 0.001 ppm = 0.001 mg/L
(remember that 1 Liter is 1000 grams, so 1 mg in one liter is a thousandth of a gram in one thousand grams, or 1 part in a million).
Chemtrail claims
This video is very popular right now. Claiming that water was analyzed and found to have barium in it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okB-489l6MI
The video was taken in Stamps, Arkansas, which is not entirely surprising as that’s in a region of the US the might be renamed “Contrail Alley”. It’s at the intersection of the cross country routes between the West Coast, and the major airport in Atlanta, Orlando and Jacksonville. Stamps is midway between the two major regional VORs (Texarkana and El Dorado), right next to the major East-West airway Victor V278, and on the edge of a MOA that traffic has to skirt occasionally. It’s also directly below the Atlanta to Dallas, San Antonio to New York and Houston to Chicago flight routes. On just ONE of these routes (Atlanta to Dallas) there is a scheduled commuter flight, directly overhead, at contrail altitude every 15 minutes! The same frequency of flights is found on the Houston-Chicago route, which crosses at right angles almost exactly overhead. Hence, when the weather is right, it is inevitable that you will see contrails in a grid pattern, “a giant checkerboard”. See this Google Earth file: airlines-over-stamps.kmz
But back to the video. It shows a jar of dirty water (collected 9/1/2007), which was collected by Bill Nichols. He’s posted some comments on the YouTube video describing how he collected the water:
it was rainwater. i collected it in two separate bowls on the hood of a pickup truck in my backyard. we are 25 miles from the nearest interstate. this is a very poor county, the only industry is chickens, logging , farming, a little oil—no coal burners or anything like that. i wasn’t looking for attention. i was looking for answers, ksla said they would pay to get it tested. i dropped it off, and they asked my opinion
i put 2 clean bowls there specifically because i wanted to catch what was falling. i don’t recall exactly when i put the bowls there, but they were there for about a month before i contacted ksla. the goo that i caught was full of barium. have a cool day!
Pause for a second, and consider if you left a bowl out for the month of August in rural Arkansas, what would you expect to find in it after a month? Some dirty water? Perhaps a little dust? What’s dust made of outdoor? Dirt, dried topsoil. What would you expect to find in the dirt in Arkansas - one of the richest sources of barium in the US? You’d expect a bit of Barium - but did they actually find any more than you’d get in tap water?
This dirty water was tested, the test results are available in full here. You can also see the results in the video, at around 00:55 to 00:59. Here they are pieced together.

And just to be clear, here’s a closeup of the results, and the units:

That’s quite straightforward right? Barium found at 68.8 µg/L. That’s 68.8 parts per billion. Now listen to the audio at that precise point (also transcribed on the KSLA web site):
“The results: a high level of barium, 6.8 parts per million (ppm), more than three times the toxic level set by the EPA”.
Immediately you can see something is wrong here. it’s 68.8, not 6.8, and it’s not parts per million, it’s parts per billion. So it’s actually 0.0688 parts per million.
And what of “three times the toxic level set by the EPA”? They are referring to the EPA Limits, as quoted by the CDC:
“The EPA has set a limit of 2.0 milligrams of barium per liter of drinking water (2.0 mg/L), which is the same as 2 ppm [parts per million].”
So the EPA limit is 2 ppm (2000 µg/L), and the tests actually found 0.0688 ppm (68.8 µg/L), just 3.4% of the allowable limit.
That limit’s not really a “toxic level” either. There’s no evidence that it would be toxic even at that level (which, remember, is 29 times higher than what was actually found). The world health organization has set a drinking water level of 7 ppm after doing studies into the health effects of barium.
Barium has always been in water
The WHO also reported on the barium levels in drinking water (meaning, from a tap, not some dirty puddle) and they found:
“In a study of water supplies of cities in the USA, a median value of 43 μg/litre was reported; in 94% of all determinations, the concentrations found were below 100µg/litre (IPCS, 1990)“
So the average was 43 µg/L, but most were below 100µg/L. This means the amount of Barium found in this supposed chemtrail residue was about the same as was found in the municipal water supplies in the US, back in 1990. This is pretty low, it varies with geography based on the type of rocks in the aquifer. In Tuscany, Italy, the Barium in drinking water was around 1000µg/L (1ppm), high, but still within safe limits.
The amount of barium will also vary based on the weather. Very heavy rains will leach more barium out into the groundwater. So you’d expect more barium after very rainy seasons. This is actually what you find if you look at the historical records in California (which has very uneven annual rainfall). You see spikes in barium whenever there is a wet year after a dry year. Recent years like these are 1991, 1995, 1998 and 2004 (2001 and 2003 also spiked to a lesser extent). The expected peaks were confirmed by the results of Rosalind Peterson at California Skywatch.
So what’s going on here? Chemtrail theorists are constantly claiming that “chemtrails” are made of barium, and that it’s affecting our health. But whenever water is tested, it is found to have perfectly normal levels of barium, which vary as expected based on the rainfall. In the cases where they claim it’s got an unusual amount, this is just a misunderstanding of the units and limits involved.
Yes, there is barium in the drinking water, there always has been, and always will be. Trace amounts, mostly from the environment and some industrial pollution. It’s a very small amount, and not dangerous. There is no evidence to suggest it has anything to do with “chemtrails.”
Saturday 08 Dec 2007 | Uncinus | chemtrails, contrails, science

Hello, isn’t it curious Lead shows a dangerous level but was not discussed? Did Ferrell hide the text “ug/l” next to the Lead 89.1 intentionally? Either way it’s still about 6 times too high is it not? How do you explain that?
Thanks,
Ron
GeorgiaWeblog.com
Yes, it’s six times too high for the EPA limit for drinking water (15 ppb). But unfortunately it’s not at all unusual for levels actually found in municipal water supplies (the standard was reduced in 1991 from 50 to 15). See:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/233287_lead20.html
Also remember this is water from a bowl that was left out on the hood of a pickup truck for over a month - which means the particulates from the air would be vastly more concentrated than found in a direct rainwater sample.
100LL is the most widely used piston engine aircraft fuel and although it’s listed as LL (low lead) it still contains up to 0.56 grams of lead per liter. About 97 percent of gasoline used
in piston-engine powered aircraft is leaded avgas, mostly 100LL. The remaining three percent is ethanol-free unleaded automotive gasoline (mogas).
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2007/November/Day-16/a22456.htm
I understand what you are saying, but what’s the broader point? Do you think that aviation fuel is contributing significantly to the amount of lead in drinking water? Does this have anything to do with contrails or “chemtrails”?
Yeah, the dude is a dunce and the reporter f’d up…but there is a history of US military experiements involving barium clouds. The below is a link to a military database for scientific research:
http://stinet.dtic.mil/stinet/jsp/docread.jsp?K2DocKey=http%3A%2F%2Fstinet.dtic.mil%2Fstinet%2FXSLTServlet%3Fad%3DADA055969%40trA-search&Format=1F&Custom=&querytext=clouds+barium&AD=ADA055969&TI=Ion+Cloud+Modeling.&RD=November+11%2C+1977&DC=%26nbsp%3B+%26nbsp%3B+%26nbsp%3B+%26nbsp%3B+%26nbsp%3B+01+-+APPROVED+FOR+PUBLIC+RELEASE&XPC=&PAG=92+Pages%28s%29&MC=&PE=&idx=9
not saying that proves anything about chemtrails, this is documentation that the military has experiemented with atmospheric barium ion clouds. If you search http://stinet.dtic.mil for “barium cloud” you’ll find a few results.
Just sayin.
nice joke at an attempt to “debunk” chemtrails…we already have the hint of whats going on and youre not fooling anyone with your sarcastic bad science. Here ill recommend something for ya. Go type in google Chemtrails.
thank you for a different viewpoint other than everything-is-crazy-we-are-all-going-to-die!!!
more of goverment shills trying to dis credit people
TELL US THE TRUTH AND STOP SPAYING US LIKE INSECTS.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=okB-489l6MI
Wildwelder, the video you are linking is discussed and debunked in the post you are commenting on! (Scroll up to the top of this page and start reading).
dude you can say it is “debunked” all you want here in arizona especially the phoenix area “they”start spraying on monday morning at 0800 am ,spray until sunset,then start again on tuesday am untill sunset and wednesday we have overcast skies,people cannot breathe ,and “oh”it is a miracle”we are going to get rain in the south of our state and snow up north!!
say what you want “they”are spraying us like insects.
I’m afraid you are mistaking normal contrails for some kind of spraying. Do you have any evidence, such as photos or videos?
F Y I IT IS 1133 AM AZ TIME WE WOKE UP TODAY TO A CLEAR BLUE SKY ,NOTHING NO SPRAYING OR CLOUDS
SEEMS KIND OF ODD THAT MONDAY AND TUESDAY WE WITNESSED MULTIPLE AIR CRAFT SPRAYING ALL DAY AND INTO THE NIGHT AND NOW TODAY 2/21/08 NOTHING!!!!
Is it also odd that one day is cloudy and the next is sunny?
The weather changes from day to day, even hour to hour. The formation of persistent contrails depends on the weather (at the jet’s altitude). So as the weather changes, the amount and type of contrails changes.
I LIVE ON THE BACK-SIDE OF THE HOLLYWOOD HILL,OVER LOOKING THE
ENTIRE SAN FERNANDO VALLY..I AM UP 200 FT. PLUS OFF THE VALLY
FLOOR. I CAN SEE TO THE WEST,THE NORTH AND THE EAST 20 MILES
PLUS..ALMOST EVERY MORN. EARLY,THE TRAILS START TO BE MADE IN
THE EAST..I FILM IT. THE CHEMICAL HAZE FLOATS WEST. TOWARDS ME.
TODAY ALL DAY THE ENTIRE VALLY WAS CRISS CROSSED WITH C.T.’S
3/19/08 georgemarsone@yahoo.com STUDIO CITY
George, here’s two satellite photos taken on that day. When you are on the ground you can only see a very small part of the big picture. The first picture is earlier in the day, see how there is a lot of cloud inland, especially to the north and east of the Valley. It would be cloudy like this regardless of if there were contrails or not.
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/subsets/?AERONET_La_Jolla/2008079/AERONET_La_Jolla.2008079.terra.1km.jpg
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/subsets/?AERONET_La_Jolla/2008079/AERONET_La_Jolla.2008079.aqua.1km.jpg
For comparison, here’s yesterday’s shots of Western Africa (Nigeria), which has a similar coastline (but more tropical).
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/subsets/?NAfrica_3_04/2008079/NAfrica_3_04.2008079.terra.1km.jpg
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/subsets/?NAfrica_3_04/2008079/NAfrica_3_04.2008079.aqua.2km.jpg
Uncinus, Uncinus, Uncinus,
It is so obvious what is taking place right in front of our eyes. All you have to do is just look up. I live in Redding Ca. where the spraying is very heavy almost daily. Today in fact, is one of only 3 days in the last month that we have not been bombarded with this stuff. You can literally watch the poison drip down out of the sky. Coincidently, the planes are always white with no markings. They average at least one every 10 minutes. We do not have that many commercial flights scheduled over us every day. When a commercial flight does fly over, it does not leave the so called “persistent contrail”. Why all of a sudden are the contrails “persistent” now? Contrails do not continue to grow and spread to connect with other contrails until the entire sky is a blanket of this stuff. It also has a distinctive odor to it. An odor that is only present when this stuff is in the air. Take a pair of binoculars and position yourself so that there is a blockage between you and the sun. Look towards the sun behind the blockage like the corner of the house. Slowly bring the binoulars from behind the blockage just until the corona of the sun appears. Be careful not to look directly into the sun. What you will see are the fibers floating through the air if there has been spraying previously. On heavy spray days there is a spike in absent employees where I work, they all report the same symptons. Mostly respiratory issues, fatigue, migrane headaches etc. I have missed 2 days myself this month already. There may be certain conditions where contrails may linger in the air longer than usual, but not every day. This happens on hot dry days and on humid days, which are becoming more rare. On days that rain is predicted all we get is a few drops if any at all. The barium sucks the moisture right out of the clouds as it oxidizes in the air. All you are doing by posting your scripted propaganda is making it obvious to everyone that your purpose on this blog is to debunk chemtrails no matter what anyone says. These clouds do not look like normal clouds, they do not behave like normal clouds and they only form after there has been a period of spraying. You even go so far as to try to convince people that barium has always been in our environment and our drinking water as if it is a normal occurrence and it is o.k. to ingest it. I could go on and on debunking you Mr. Uncinus., but you are not convincing anyone with your lies. You are trying to convince people that what they are witnessing with their own eyes is not really happening. Well, it is happening! Open your eyes and look! It is that simple.
rudedog, Redding actually has a HUGE amount of commercial flights over it, mostly north-south.
How many flights do you think there are just from Los Angeles to Seattle (and back) every day?
Really, how many? How many per hour.
Then what about the other cities? San Francisco, Portland, San Diego, Vancouver. They all fly over Redding.
I do not see any clouds, only man made aerosols, even if you like to call them contrails the fact stands NASA classification is that they are man made and cause global warming! We no longer have natural clouds or very minimal.
Where don’t you see any clouds? I see a lot in the satellite photos. Only a minisule percentage of them are from contrails on that particular day (and pretty much non in Africa, as far as I can tell).
How can you be so sure of that? That is like saying they are chemtrails, haha, just by looking at an image.
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/realtime/single.php?2008106/crefl2_143.A2008106074500-2008106074959.500m.jpg
This image for example shows older aerosols are nicely morphing into spanned out aerosols (clouds) it must have taken some hours for this to happen under the right conditions, along with the right amount of air traffic, no?
Thanks for the prompt replies, here is a better example although not contrails the image is clearer.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/Archive/Jan2008/ships_amo_2008021_lrg.jpg
Do you have a Global Warming Science section on the site covering such research on contrail effects?
Can you explain what you mean by “aerosols”. The photos you link to look like normal clouds to me - can you explain what about them looks man-made?
Why not ask NASA what they mean about aerosols, or any University or government meteorology agency that researches weather modification or clouds. They will explain better, also ask a scientist about their definition of a standard contrail. Not me, you need to know this more than me for this site. And on the global warming issue as well, NASA know so much more on this along with meteorologists at various Universities that study the effects.
I wouldn’t want to offend a partial blind person but I would bet they could even see trails in the image.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/Archive/Jan2008/ships_amo_2008021_lrg.jpg
Thanks for linking to various NASA links, I found that some aerosol trails exist in the atmosphere from temperatures of 7 degrees celsius up to 17 degrees celsius with, also the difference of humidity and temperature is different depending on the size of clouds or span and widths of aerosol trails.
I know what the definition of an aerosol is, I wanted to know what YOU meant by it.
An aerosol is a suspension of fine solid or liquid droplets in a gas.
Clouds are suspensions of tiny drops of water in the air.
So, clouds are aerosols, normal, everyday clouds. Also contrails are aerosols.
You keep using that word, but I do not think it means what you think it means.
The photo you link do does not show contrails, it shows ship trails. A similar end result, but a different mechanism. See here:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/coolimg/shiplume/shiploop.htm
(page takes a while to load, but has a nice animation of ship trails being formed)
An aerosol is a general broad term, it could be invisible particulate pollutants, chemicals, bio contaminants that spread through other contaminants. But I meant condensation trail aerosols and the ability to trap in heat causing global warming. On the other hand other scientists both governmental and non governmental talk about other uses.
A European scientist offered an option of using offshore aerosol precipitation stations in the 1980’s that had constant feeds from the sea water for aerolizing of particles to cause artificial clouds (aerosols) to cause more global cover and bounce out light to attempt to cool the world. Anyway why one would want this when there is still no verified solid scientific evidence of global warming or global cooling seems very unnecessary, but then it is not the only technology type being proposed or forced on us daily.
http://newyorkskywatch.com/climate-engineers-war-profit-survival
I think you may have a closed mind, given the governmental and scientific community that have been discussing such forms of geoengineering for decades. Do you really think any government allows disclosure, no they use secret information act law, if anyone talks that works on such projects they go to jail. the same applies to contractors that work with anti terrorism projects. It is a military defense operation, under national security protocol.
I won’t waste any more typing on this here though. Even if water was being sprayed in the atmosphere via military tankers this would still concern me very much and is something I would want to be informed about. Just as I want complete disclosure on all research of the effects of global contrails on the biosphere.
Aha, so by “aerosols”, you mean “contrails” and “aviation induced cirrus”.
People make speculative plans for all kinds of things. There was a plan to rocket nuclear waste into outer space. These are just early stages of ideas. People think more about them, and decide if they should do them or not.
There is LOTS of research on the effects of of global contrails on the biosphere. Mostly it focuses on pollution, and the effects on the climate, as that’s what causes changes in the biosphere. Here’s a good place to start:
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/aviation/003.htm
You ask for “complete disclosure”, but what if they told you they were not doing any spraying, and that the contrails are not deliberate attempts to alter the climate, then what would you do?
I fail to see how comparisons with tap water, especially American tap water, the water you get fromyour taps is some of the more heavily bastardised in the world, can prove or disprove anything…
perhaps it should be compared to the clean rain water, purified by nature that falls from the sky here in NZ… i could send you some from milford sound, they average over 6m/year, the rain clouds come in from the west where there is but ocean for 1,500+ Kilometres
The point is that barium is found naturally in the environment - in the air, the ground and the water. It also varies greatly by location. There are a lot of barium mines in Arkansas, so you would expect to find more barium in the air there.
And, if you read the details, very little barium was actually found in the sample tested. Especially when you consider it was collected by leaving a bowl out in the yard for over a month. You might want to try that, and see what the resultant water look like.