Things That Are NOT Contrails (or Chemtrails)
Contrails are long thin clouds of ice crystals that form behind planes that fly through freezing cold air. Usually you see them behind jets at around 30,000 feet. If the air they fly though has enough moisture in it already, then these contrail clouds can last for a long time before they evaporate. Sometimes you get a lot of them at once in the sky, if the weather is right. They look like this:
Note: the trails in the above photo ARE CONTRAILS (and some natural clouds). That’s a photo taken by NASA scientist Louis Nguyen from I-95 in northern Virginia, January 26, 2001. This is the only photo of contrails in this article. The remaining photos are NOT contrails.
There are several things that a superficially somewhat similar, in that they involve stuff coming out of the back of an airplane and/or lines in the sky. But these things are not contrails.
SKYWRITING
Skywriting is making patterns in the sky using smoke trails. Done at a low altitude using small planes, it can look very like a contrail, but it’s very different as skywriting is made from smoke (made from injecting oil into the hot exhaust), and contrails are made from ice crystals.
SKYTYPING
Also known as “Dot Matrix Sky Writing”, See:
http://www.geicoskytypers.com/
Skytyping utilizes five airplanes that fly abreast, 250-feet apart and “type” up to 25-30 character messages in a dot-matrix-like pattern. Skytyping is 17 times faster than skywriting, laying out a letter every 4 seconds. During skytyping aerial exhibitions, the pilots fly their aircraft in a line-abreast formation while a computer in the lead plane sends radio signals to the smoke systems in each plane in the formation, thus creating a customized message in a dot-matrix pattern of environmentally safe puffs of smoke.
In the above photo the trails have been blurred by the wind, but you can kind of make out letters in the section to the right.
AEROBATIC SMOKE TRAILS
Rather similar to skywriting, smoke trails are used to enhance exhibitions of aerobatics, often with different colored trails. These are the Red Arrows, in the UK.
Even gliders can perform aerobatics, and they often have wingtip smoke generators to show this off:
CROP DUSTING
More technically called “Aerial Application”, this involves spraying crops or agricultural areas with fertilizers, pesticides, fungicides, or defoliants, for a variety of reasons. Typically done with small planes or helicopters just a few tens of feet above the crop, like this:
PEST SPRAYING
Sometimes larger areas that an few fields are sprayed for things like mosquito control. Larger planes can be used, but they still have to spray very close to the ground. Here’s a C-130 spraying a few hundred feet up:
RESEARCH SMOKE TRAILS
Sometimes planes have smoke emitters placed on them for research purposes – generally visualize the flow of air behind the plane, the vorticies, or “wake turbulence” which can be dangerous to other planes. Here’s one example:
CLOUD STREETS
Atmospheric conditions can make clouds form in odd ways. These unusual stratocumulus clouds called “cloud streets” formed over the Sea of Okhotsk, Northern Japan, on June 18th, 2007.
Here’s a satellite photo of the region showing these clouds:
CLOUD SEEDING
People try to make clouds produce more rain by “Seeding” them with tiny particles of things like sliver iodine. This is done using incendiary devices attached to the aircraft. Basically flares that are burnt one at a time. Here’s what they look like in action.
Long shots of clouds seeding are hard to come by, because it happens inside or above the cloud. If you see a long trail coming from behind a plane, then it’s not cloud seeding. The trail is very thin, and probably not noticeable from the ground, even if you could see the plane.
FIRE FIGHTING
Planes are often used in fighting fires, and typically drop fire retardant from a low. Often it’s bright red, but sometimes it’s just water pulled from a nearby lake. This one is in Missoula, Montana. Note it’s a fairly low altitude, probably 1000 feet or so.
FUEL DUMPING
When a plane takes off they are usually full of fuel. At this point they are too heavy to safely land (it’s a lot easier on a plane to take off than to land). If they have to cut their trip short, then they have to get rid of that excess weight. They can just fly around for hours to burn it off, but some planes have a fuel dump system that lets them get rid of the excess fuel rapidly by just dumping it into the air. This is often from vents at the end of the wing, but sometimes it’s mid-wing, or at the tail.
This is a Navy E-6B Mercury (TACAMO), dumping fuel from its mid-wing vents.

Here’s a rare set of shots from the ground of a jet dumping fuel
Note the difference between this and a contrail. You can see it’s coming from the wingtips, and you can see the trails just kind of blur out as it spreads and evaporates, unlike contrails which have much more well-defined edges, even as they fade away. See here for the full story behind this incident:
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/3523366/
The aircraft, of of KLM’s B744 full passenger versions, registered PH-BFG, took off from SFO and somewhere around Sacramento the crew decided to turn back to SFO because the nosewheel wouldn’t retract.
See also:
http://www.modbee.com/local/story/34136.html
GLIDER BALLAST DUMPING
Gliders use water for ballast, and they sometimes let some out to reduce their descent rate, usually when landing. It looks similar to fuel dumping. Here’s a nice example:
ROCKET TRAILS
Some rockets actually do produce a kind of contrail if they are hydrogen fueled they produce a lot of water. But for most rockets there is also a lot of visible smoke. When they get very high up, the trail spreads out and is lit by the sun in unusual ways. You see this a lot with the missile tests in California. You could call this a contrail if you wanted, so long as you note it’s a rocket contrail, and so contains smoke.
SHIP TRAILS
Generally seen best from space, large ships can create a trail in the atmosphere above it that resembles a contrail. These are off the coast of France. They are generally more squiggly than contrails, as the ships move much slower, so the trail is at the mercy of the wind to a greater degree.
FLARES
Military planes shoot out flares to confuse heat-seaking missiles. These are very bright, and leave smoke trails. Usually they shoot off in all different directions, like this:
CHAFF
Chaff is a substance that planes spray to confuse radar. Generally it thin fibers, coated with aluminum. I could not find ANY photos of chaff being sprayed, despite it being used since the 1940s. This is probably because it just looks like fine dust. It does not leave a trail (it would be rather pointless to defeat the radar, but then have a big line pointing to where you are). It’s only visible to radar.
GUN SMOKE
This photo I originally thought was chaff, as that was how it was labeled, but then someone pointed out it was actually smoke from the guns firing. Not chaff, but not a contrail either. There are a variety of reasons why smoke can be coming from an airplane.

27 comments Friday 01 Aug 2008 | Uncinus | contrails, science
27 Responses to “Things That Are NOT Contrails (or Chemtrails)”
Leave a Reply
To quote someone, please use <blockquote> and </blockquote> tags, for example:
<blockquote>But surely the contrails would evaporate?
How do you explain that, given those facts?</blockquote>



















I’m not really sure, but may it be that the “fog” in the last foto is actually the smoke from the GAU-8 gatling gun? The gun firing makes a lot of smoke (you can see a photo of an A-10 firing on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:A-10_Thunderbolt_II_Gun_Run.JPEG)
I think you are right niio, I’ll have to add a new category “Gun Smoke”
Who are you?
I’m just some guy.
Anyone know if smoke trails (such as those produced for skywriting or aerobatic shows) are also emitted for other purposes – such as wind measurement / indicators for landing aircraft or skydivers? I have been told this is the case – but have been unable to confirm.
Also, what is generally the minimum altitude that contrails form? I saw 30,000 feet mentioned. What about lower?
Nick, smoke trails are used for studying wake vorticies. They can also be used as emergency wind indicators at temporary landing sites (military, usually, with smoke grenades). Skydivers use them for display purposes.
Contrails can form at any altitude if the temperature is cold enough (around -40), so they can form at sea level in Alaska. Normally over the Southern US, they form above 25,000 – higher in summer, but it depends on the weather.
This morning I have seen over a dozen of those rockets with contrails flying overhead – all heading relatively in the same direction. And my curiosity sparked up. Does anyone know the purpose of their flight. Data collection…? Are they even manned? When I searched the web for some answers this site came up. Thanks for the info, it is always rewarding to learn something new.
I can think of at least one other source of smoke or clouds that is not a contrail: Smoke from fires, engine malfunctions or other aircraft problems.
I remember a few years ago an aircraft had to make an emergency landing after it took off and some kind of malfunction caused the APU to catch fire. I’m not sure exactly what happened, I think it may have been lubricating oil that burned or perhaps some extra fuel in the APU, but basically the aircraft landed with gray smoke coming out of the tail and the passengers had to be evacuated with slides and that kind of thing. The emergency response units got things put out pretty quickly by spraying some foam on it.
Once in a while there’s an engine fire or just an engine malfunction that causes smoke to pour out. There are also aircraft systems for suppressing like engine nacelle fire extinguisher systems – these too could leave some clouds or trails when activated.
I dont care what anybody says anymore…Its right infront of our faces people…they are spraying us with something and are not talking about it.
people who make fun of me for saying this are unable to believe the enormity as to which they are manipulated and controled into thinking that they are free by being given a false sense identity and reality through church and education…now the time is coming when the grid that supports their empire (we call it the western world) is going to fall do to the planetary changes and changes in our minds as a whole.
they are doing this to either A.
slow down this proccess of global warming do to the SUN in occordance to their dead line set around 2012..
all the planets are showing an increase in surface temp.
what is happening to our planet is a cosmic event….earth quakes in this decade alone has shot up from an average of 4, 5, 6, a year to atleast…ATLEAST 40 a year starting around 2002…only months afters 9 11 ..is when it shot up.
check the USGS website for a detailed record of annual earthquakes that are above the 3.0 on the R scale…Its real folks…somthing is happening and the ELITE KNOW IT and are in a race to finish what thier ansestors started thousands of years ago.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/world/historical.php
B they are making us sick or weakening our immunsystem
or C… using this stuff as a conductor for some kind of communications TECH.
hell maybe all 3.
Its like in the movie The Matrix..when the U.N. scorched the sky as a first step in killing off the massive hoard of robotic slaves who began to rebel against there corrupt masters who were eventually defeated.
Kinda IRONIC dont you think my friends…being that the Matrix movie mirrors the situation we are in on this planet.
There are not more earthquakes, just more seismographs, for more details see:
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/eqstats.html
And:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/topics/increase_in_earthquakes.php
You are spreading/creating propaganda and I hope you burn in hell for it. Any intelligent person who can remember the skies from a decade ago, knows that something is happening.
Well…one person’s truth is another person’s propaganda…
But honestly, when you look at the pictures here:
http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/
What do you make of it??
How do the skies today look any different? How do the trails behave any differently?
The physics of the atmosphere that dictate the behavior of ice crystals have not changed….
So what has? More planes? The internet’s ability to feed mass hysteria? Deterioration in education causing a drop off in the ability for research and logical reasoning skills?
What?
Nick, I hope, as you do, that the persons responsible for spreading propaganda “burn in hell for it”. Unfortunately for YOU, it will be YOU and your friends on youtube and conspiracy sites that will be burning. The simple and basic science that you are ignorant about pretty much guarantees that you are destined for a VERY warm eternity! I have seen these trails over MY region for my entire life, 44+ years. I was VERY interested in science and aviation and took the time to learn the facts before I was 13. I suggest you do the same some day. It will greatly benefit you.
Living life in fear of your own people just because you are ignorant of the facts seems so pathetic. I pity you for failing to properly educate yourself. Like I said, this is basic stuff here…it can’t be “made up” nor is there any reason to make it up! Also, calling for people to burn in hell just because YOU are ignorant of the truth seems quite disgusting! You are bearing false witness! How dare you!
Nick, these guys go all day and night. They are never wrong. Just let them be. You and I both know what is happening.
No Ian, you “think” (and I use that term VERY loosely) you and he both “know” what is happening. Yet, what is obvious you DON’T know is anything about your own atmosphere, or aviation. Go ahead. Believe what you want. It’s amusing how you CHOOSE to be ignorant and concerned about the lines in the sky. Enjoy that! I sleep well knowing that simple and basic science easily refutes what the alarmist chemtards are spreading….ignorance.
Like I said, all day.
And again, YOUR perception of the facts proves you to be paranoid. On here, I check the site out twice a day unless I am actively involved in a conversation. On youtube, I set up my account with a dedicated email address and get an email anytime someone replies to a post of mine or posts something on my channel. When that email arrives I get a tone. Wherever/whenever I am, I’m near a computer (and the iphone itself) and am able to fire off a reply in a few seconds. In this day and age it’s beneficial to multi-task. I’m sorry to hear that you are unable. I have a job that is equally physical and deskjob and have SEVERAL computers available at home and work. I’m able to respond to anyone from anywhere at any time during any day, yet still get my work done and enjoy plenty of time with my family.
yes, I DO spend a LOT of time trying to get chemtards to take the time to properly educate themselves about aviation and atmospheric science. I think they are hurting themselves and this country when they spread paranoid ignorance as fact. It’s disgusting. I have a passion for the truth…and so should you. Instead you have fallen for a hoax and have employed confirmation bias in your research techniques. You, as a group, are also VERY distrustful of those who are educated in these subjects and spread lies about us. I will defend myself from such paranoid rubbish. Just as you would if someone was telling lies about the particular burgers you will undoubtedly spend the rest of your life flipping.
Cool. I congratulate your services on keeping busy.
I feel there is no need to call me a chemtard. After review of the evidence provided on this website I am in complete agreement to this contrail phenomena. I beg your pardon on the slanderous outburst.
A chemtard, is what you are. It’s the name given to those who’s education ended (retarded) BEFORE they learned how the atmosphere works. And I KNOW you are lying about believing the info on this site. No chemtard has ever actually learned the facts and admitted to understand.
Thats where you are wrong. I’ve looked deep into your vault of evidence here on this website and have come to a conclusion that what i am seeing actually a normal phenomenon. I was stupid to think that it as chemicals.
Yes, you sure were.
This is a bunch of hogwash. My 83 year old father knows what’s been in the sky for the last 83 years and what hasn’t. So do I.
I’m sick and tired of people thinking they are actually convincing anyone with the ridiculous fake debunking.
We are being chemtrailed, all over the world. The global elite say it in their own documents! They are out to kill 80-90% of the world’s population and chemtrails are part of it.
Which documents? What exactly do they say?
How do you explain all the old photos of contrails that look just like “chemtrails”?
So now your 83 year old father (and yourself) are ignoring history and rewriting it without persisting contrails? I guess if you don’t like the facts, you can simply make up new ones to support your case. Obviously there are people out there willing to believe hearsay.
As Uncinus says, how do you explain old photos and reports of persisting contrails?
Debunking that relies specifically on facts? Oh yes, that’s very fake lol.
Yeah, I heard that on Coast to Coast AM as well, it must be true! Again as Uncinus asked above, where are these reports?
[...] 1. I await candidates. First check here and here. [...]
I have to correct you on the firefighting picture. That B-17 is not fighting fire. It is most likely one of many surplus B17’s that was used up until the early 70’s or so to fight gypsy moth or some other insect or infestations in forests around the country. Surplus B17’s were in fact used to fight forest fire during the same time period, but this airplane is not. If it were fighting fire the material whatever color and composition it might be, would be emanating from the bottom of the fuselage from where the stock bomb bay was not the wings. It would also appear MUCH more concentrated and fall in a more vertical manner than a trailing manner like in the pic. The concentration that is emanating from the wings of this B17 would not put out even a very small fire. When I mean small fire I mean less than a campfire size, more like match intensity. I have over 17 years of aerial crop/ forestry spraying and firefighting experience and I’m positive of what’s happening there.
That’s a fairly rare pic of that B17 in action in that kind of work, it should be preserved.
However, I deeply agree with you that the perception of contrails by the more ignorant among the population who are most likely so bored that they must cook up something to make themselves feel useful to the planet are dead wrong.Thanks for your efforts
Thanks flyinsnoopy. I’m guilty of plucking a pretty picture from Google images, and trusting the caption. Looking at it now it does seem unlikely to be fire-fighting. But I got it from here:
http://www.ngsprints.co.uk/North-America-Geography-Forests/c1_90_573/p102946/Forest-Service-Plane-Drops-Fire-Retardant-On-Forest./product_info.html
Is that possibly accurate?