Broken Contrails
Contrails are clouds made from water vapor that condenses then freezes behind a plane engine. Since the engines are on constantly, it seems a bit odd when you see contrails with gaps in them, or even contrails that stop and start. If the engine is pumping out a constant amount of water, then why is the trail not constant? This puzzle is sometimes seized on by people who think that persistent contrails are actually “chemtrails”, or some kind of deliberate spraying operation.
But it’s actually very simply. The amount of water in the exhaust is pretty constant, but the amount of moisture in the air is not. The humidity varies with altitude, and a layer of low humidity can be sandwiched between two layers of high humidity. As a plane climbs or descends through this layer, then the trail will only form in the areas of high humidity, and so look like it was “switched off” in the area of low humidity.
You can get the same effect with temperature. A warm layer of air can actually lay on top of a colder layer in what is called an “inversion” (you’ll hear this on the weather sometimes, referred to as an “inversion layer”). When a plane flies through this inversion layer, the trail can be “broken”.
It’s not just climbing or descending flights either. The boundaries between these layers is not flat, and gravity waves or rising convection currents of air can create large volume of air that differ in temperature and/or humidity from the neighboring air, and so can break (or make) the contrail when then plane flies through them.
Don’t take my word for it though. Do a Google search for “broken contrail” and you’ll find lots of examples, and similar explanations (Click the photos above for two).
Occasionally a jet plane, especially if ascending or descending, will pass through a much drier or more moist layer of atmosphere which may result in a broken pattern to the contrail, with it appearing in segments rather than in one continuous plume.
If the contrail stops, then starts up again, creating a broken line, chances are the airplane flew through a dry patch.
What is happening here is that warm air rising from the ground carries vast amounts of water vapor upwards into the highest levels of the atmosphere. This water vapor exists as massive, plumes of warm, moist air ascending to very high levels. When a rising plume reaches the upper atmosphere it condenses into high ice clouds known as cirrus or feather clouds. In the case of the jet contrail (condensation trail) in the first image, the condensing cloud formed where the aircraft passed through a rising plume of moist warm air. The air on either side of the plume was not sufficiently moist to support the formation of an enduring cloud. As a result the contrail only remained visible in the warmth plume.
Friday 08 Jun 2007 | Uncinus | chemtrails, contrails, science

Hi, Uncinus
I thought I’d let you know that JazzRoc, Epoxynous, and Doublemeat appear to be ONE.
A single AGENT SMITH in the “chemtrailer” park.
In the interests of sanity we three ought to group together… and rejoin our obviously SPLIT personalities. Just joking…
Jazzybaby
contrail science? to purport to talk of “contrail science” then hide your credentials is suspicious to say the least, i do not know of any scientist who would do extensive research on a subject and then not cite documentation or reference directly the “german research” etc then add to this not put his name to anything!
i put it to you sir that this site is no more than a selectively edited message board for a single viewpoint designed to do very little but misinform. i suggest that people refer to the wikipedia page on chemtrails as a start point not some anonymous site run by people whos reference material is cited as “some german contrail research”.
can i suggest you rename the page “contrail stuff” cos ive read every page and cant find any proper “science” anywhere.
“chances are” and “probably” which are words from your site whoever you are,are not really terminology used in scientific documentation unless probability math is your discipline.
Hi Anonymous, I do actually try to give sources wherever possible. Like in the article above, I give three fairly authoritative sources: the NOAA, Airspace Magazine and Doc Weather.
There has been a lot of “German Research”, so I’m not sure what you are referring to, but it was probably something from here:
http://www.dlr.de/pa/en/desktopdefault.aspx/
If you find any errors in my site, I’d be happy to correct them.
Good site!!!
My name is Heriberto, I am an argentinian-spaniard psychologist living in Madrid.
The “chemtrails” are explained: they are contrails.
What remain unexplained is the sociopsychological aspect of the problem: why people believe in such a weird thing?
I am investigating the possible answer in
http://espacioexterior.blogspot.com
Greetings.
Why do people believe weird things? Good question.
I think people subconsciously like to believe in conspiracy theories because it gives them a sense of control and understanding of a world that has become too complex for the average person to fully understand.
By attributing their woes to a malevolent higher power, they simplify the world, removing doubt, and raising their perceived status above the “sheeple”.
Yawn, yawn, yawn, which gov. agency is sponsoring this site? You can fool some people most of the time, but you will never fool everyone.
This is an obvious clandestine operation. Conspiracies are ongoing,’I think people subconsciously like to believe in conspiracy theories because it gives them a sense of control and understanding of a world that has become too complex for the average person to fully understand’
What an absolute crock of crackpot psychology. What we understand is all of this is a lie.
Hi Doc, I take it by your lack of pointing out inaccuracies here that you don’t actually disagree with anything I’m saying, but just think I’m using the truth to confuse people?
If not, what exactly have I said that is incorrect?
I think the reason folks believe so easily in conspiracy “theories” is because history so readily proves reason to be suspicious of government! I used to give the benefit of the doubt. Now, well, like government treats its own US citizens, guilty until proven innocent. (ever been audited?)
There is much controversey regarding the 9/11 investigations. And gov’t officials don’t seem interested in continuing research pertaining to the worst “war” crime against the US in history. If there is nothing to hide, then continue the investigations!!!
Cloned farm animals have been approved by the FDA as “safe” for human consumption (when there is NO reason to be cloning farm animals to begin with. There is NO shortage of healthy meat and the FDA’s own studies along with many others show LOTS of issues with cloned animals) Genetic seeds by US companies are being forced down the throats of other countries (read Censored 2008) and devestating their farming communities! We’ve had dangerous genetic crops, i.e. Roundup ready corn, for quite a while. Our gov’t is allowing us to EAT poison, why shouldn’t we believe they are spraying it in the air now as well?
The FDA allows us to be used as guinea pigs. They protect big drug companies and food companies all the time.
I could go on and on…WHY do we believe in such conspiracy theories??? PLEASE…..Give us reason NOT to.
(this site has given me pause, though….THANK YOU. I don’t WANT to believe such horrendous acts are being taken by gov’t against its own citizens!!)
I came upon this just recently when I began researching information regarding Morgellons because a friend of mine’s sister has it! I read about it first about 5 years ago before it had a “name”…
To NOT acknowledge that possibly something is being released into our air…and a connection to this bizarre affliction is absurd. ALL possibilites should be considered.
Have you read the patent for HAARP? U. S. Patent 4,686,605. and the FAQ at http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/faq.html
Be warned there is a disclaimer at the HAARP website advising you that you are on gov’t property and will be watched! The day after I was on that site I got a message from my McAfee that a program was trying to download to intercept and redirect my computer data! And I should NOT be suspicious of the gov’t????!!!!
You’ve got a live one here, my friend. Can’t wait to get a response!
I try to stick to contrail science. Sure, the government COULD be doing all kinds of things, but where is the actual scientific evidence that they are making “chemtrails”.
Sure, I have no evidence that they are not - but that’s not a reason. There are an infinite number of things I have no evidence that the government is not doing. I have no evidence that they did not fix the superbowl - does that mean they did?
So WHY would you believe in contrails IN PARTICULAR.
Show me one scrap of solid evidence.
You’d mentioned how clear the HAARP site is on another thread..I’m merging that comment into my response now to explain why I believe chemtrails could be real.
Yes, the HAARP site IS quite clear: they state it is not for military operational use, yet the military requested its construction and manages it. That doesn’t make sense.
The patent # 4,686,605 for this “device” states Under the “Claims” section:
2. The method of claim 1 including the step of providing artificial particles in said at least one region which are excited by said electron cyclotron resonance.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein said artificial particles are provided by injecting same into said at least one region from an orbiting satellite.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said threshold excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is about 1 watt per cubic centimeter and is sufficient to cause movement of a plasma region along said diverging magnetic field lines to an altitude higher than the altitude at which said excitation was initiated.
It further states;
injecting charged particles from a satellite carrying a payload of radioactive beta-decay material or alpha emitters; and injecting charged particles from a satellite-borne electron accelerator.
AND it says:
It has also been proposed to release large clouds of barium in the magnetosphere so that photoionization will increase the cold plasma density, thereby producing electron precipitation through enhanced whistler-mode interactions.
NO, this is not a “smoking gun”…..just building a case. It certainly is cause for suspicion. If it was proposed to release “artificial particles” via satellite, why NOT use planes? Even in a court of law, enough circumstantial evidence can result in a guilty verdict. AND, like in a court of law, if the “accused” is shown to lie about other things, it lends to their character.
The HAARP experiments interact with the ionosphere. The ionosphere begins 30 miles above the surface of the earth and extends up to around 250 miles. The highest passenger jets fly at about 10 miles (with the vast majority at around 4-6 miles).
That’s why the proposal talks about using satellites.
That is why they would NOT use planes, they can’t fly high enough.
Yes it does. It’s a research facility, and not an operational facility. It has no real ability to DO anything other than excite the ionosphere in a spot for a few minutes.
The military’s interest is partly explained in the FAQ:
You didn’t respond to the patent that states a proposal for releasing barium clouds…….
I wonder if the “excitement” in the sky they conduct is visible?
We had a sky full of clouds with squared off edges that fit perfectly into eachother…horizon to horizon. I’d never seen anything quite like it. The spaces between the jagged clouds were the same width as the clouds. As the clouds left the area, there was a definite “pattern” at the edge of the cloud line as well.
I felt like I’d stepped onto an X-Files set. I sent copies to two of our local meteorologists and never got a response.
When I saw the explanation of “dropping a stone into a fast moving stream. The ripples caused by the stone are very quickly lost in the rapidly moving water and, a little farther down the stream, are completely undetectable.” I got chills, because the clouds DID look a lot like a ripple effect.
I just saw another patent regarding releasing a metalic substance in an attempt to reflect sun and offset global warming. USPatent 5,003,186. That one DOES call for using planes/jet fuel.
And a question: At 30 miles up, would gravity pull particles toward earth?
I addressed the “clouds of barium”.
The Magnetosphere starts in the ionosphere. Same thing.
Okay, ripple clouds. Now you could just look those up. But let’s narrow it down to books published between 1900 and 1910
http://books.google.com/books?lr=&as_brr=1&q=%22ripple+clouds%22+date%3A1900-1910
See the book, “Cloud Studies”, by Arthur Willian Clayden. Published in 1905, written before the invention of flight. You can download the whole thing as a pdf, or read it on google books.
http://books.google.com/books/pdf/Cloud_Studies.pdf?id=TmhDAAAAIAAJ&output=pdf&sig=swDZcBiZGCy_3dOIg85oP12wx-c
Chapter VIII, page 119, (page 241 of the PDF), is a chapter on “Wave Clouds”. go through that chapter and look at the photos, and let me know which looks like the clouds you saw. I suspect it’s Plate 55.
Thanks for the info. That link you gave for “ripple clouds” ARE similar to what I saw. I appreciate the reference materials. I’ve seen small sections of clouds looking like that before, but not an entire sky’s worth with jagged little “rays” on the edge.
They were quite amazing to see. Perhaps it may be more in the way of proof of intellegent design…(only not of human form) :o) It was beautiful, yet eerie.
Nah, it’s just nature. Nature looks pretty sometimes.
You should have a look at the Cloud Appreciation Society. They have a nice gallery, that has some way more amazing clouds.
You should also look up “cloud streets“
Ah, yes, my friend but somebody MAKES nature!! ;o) To think this all happened from some “Big Bang” or accident is like saying a print factory exploded and resulted in the Webster’s dictionary.
I’ll definitely look at the Cloud Appreciation Society. And I’m still not TOTALLY convinced that there ISN’T something sinister going on. There seems to be an awful lot of conversation regarding it, from all over the world. It warrants some investigation. I’m just trying to weigh all sides and quit freaking out everytime I look at the sky! LOL.
Good site, it challenges people to really use the brain! In fact I am convinced that artificial trails (=purposely created) exist for real. Yes, the author of this site is right for the most trails which for real are natural and not artificial. But if just only one trail is artificial all the epistemic castle would fall down in a nano-second…..
Chemtrails: this is a global wide psy-operation to make the most sensible, critic, intelligent and not submitted people to waste their time with the nose in the sky. It works in this way, (thanks the helps of an army of psychologists, psychiatrists, experts in social communication, etc.): some aircrafts spread some water at un-usual altitude or in an un-usual geometry. Then a particular social layer of people (the one I talked above) will find in the web all the ‘conspiracy’ sites backed by the same agencies (see the psy expert above) who are doing the aerial comedy (I call them no Chemtrails but Showtrails). As explanations they’ll find every kind of theory, as what matters is: to make waste the psychical energy in a wrong direction. This is a normal way to proceed by govt. agencies, which work always using the psy-warfare manuals, expecially the ones based on Sun Tzu not conventional warfare. It works fine 100%, guaranteed by Adolph and Stalin!
So even if people are wrong (as regard my particular conviction about the goals of artificial trails who is a giant psy-op) as I don’t believe in HAARP or similar, I support all their ‘conspiracy theories’ because they are expression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH and FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE, something that from day to day is more and more dangerously lacking. The most fine strategy to kill FREEDOM OF SPEECH /COSNCIENCE is to call it with a terminology taken from the world of the Nazi psychiatry: “YOU DON’T HAVE RIGHT TO SUSPECT OF YOUR GOVERMENT AND TO EXPRESS IT BECAUSE SUSPECTING YOUR GOVERMENT IS A SIGN OF MENTAL ILLNESS”.
Is it the Psycho-Bolschevik regime of New World Order?
Best regards - avles.
Avles - so you think that chemtrails don’t exist, but the chemtrail theory was cooked up by the government to keep freethinking people distracted from what is REALLY going on?
I’m afaid that without evidence, that just sounds silly.
Many fact finding and life treatening problems started from conspiracy theories. It’s good and healthy to think.
What about the woman who fought for MTBE additive being dangerous? She was touted as a nut right from the beginning. Thankfully someone paid attention. But tha’t only one small step for human-kind.
On the Conkemtrails. Please produce some photographs prior to 1999 showing this anomally or ‘phenonenom’. How can flight patterns produce waffle-like grids of contrails in the sky? Scientifically why are there huge X’s in the sky for as long as the eye can see? I’d love to here the explanations to this. Let’s go…
According to professors aren’t Ionospheric heaters able to artificially move the ionosphere lower or higher, this being part of the experiments. I have read some on this and watched some science documentaries on this, they could be all wrong though.
Uncinus
No. See here:
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/ion4.html
It heats it up, if anything this would move it higher, but really it’s just heating a small region. The point is still that contrails form about 25 miles BELOW the ionosphere.