Comments on: Thirty Contrails, Forty Years Ago http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/ The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails Thu, 17 May 2012 02:26:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Uncinus http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/comment-page-2/#comment-115849 Uncinus Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:48:35 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/#comment-115849 They were not experimenting on people. They just wanted to see how far dust or spores would travel. They chose what they thought were harmless analogs they could detect, and they sprayed they to see where they went. But I think this is an entirely separate issue, the root point still remains there's no actual evidence that the trails are anything other than contrails. They were not experimenting on people.

They just wanted to see how far dust or spores would travel. They chose what they thought were harmless analogs they could detect, and they sprayed they to see where they went.

But I think this is an entirely separate issue, the root point still remains there’s no actual evidence that the trails are anything other than contrails.

]]> By: honest debate http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/comment-page-2/#comment-115848 honest debate Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:39:26 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/#comment-115848 well i dont . I dont appreciate being anybodies lab rat. no matter how innoccuos you think it may be, of which i beg to differ and i am not so willing to dismiss the testimony of a large group of peoples suffering which they say is caused due to chemtrails so readiliy .when the science community have been so willing to lie in the past of which i think we have ascertained and as for the secondry ciggerette smoke i do believe its been proven to kill hence thats why it was banned so thats just astupid thing to say bu t what can you expect when you try to defend the indefencable and on that note iwish you goodnight and would like to thank you for youre time well i dont . I dont appreciate being anybodies lab rat. no matter how innoccuos you think it may be, of which i beg to differ and i am not so willing to dismiss the testimony of a large group of peoples suffering which they say is caused due to chemtrails so readiliy .when the science community have been so willing to lie in the past of which i think we have ascertained and as for the secondry ciggerette smoke i do believe its been proven to kill hence thats why it was banned so thats just astupid thing to say bu t what can you expect when you try to defend the indefencable and on that note iwish you goodnight and would like to thank you for youre time

]]> By: Uncinus http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/comment-page-2/#comment-115840 Uncinus Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:12:55 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/#comment-115840 In non-toxic amounts, yes. You get cadmium in higher amounts in second hand cigarette smoke. Can we get back to the actual evidence though? We all agree that the Government sprayed stuff in the past. What do you think it is doing now, and why do you think it? In non-toxic amounts, yes.

You get cadmium in higher amounts in second hand cigarette smoke.

Can we get back to the actual evidence though? We all agree that the Government sprayed stuff in the past. What do you think it is doing now, and why do you think it?

]]> By: honest debate http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/comment-page-2/#comment-115838 honest debate Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:56:03 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/#comment-115838 you never answersd my question do you think its ok for our goverments to spray their unwitting populations with cadium you never answersd my question do you think its ok for our goverments to spray their unwitting populations with cadium

]]> By: Uncinus http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/comment-page-2/#comment-115830 Uncinus Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:03:43 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/thirty-contrails-forty-years-ago/#comment-115830 I think you are getting away from the topic though. Where is the evidence of geoengineering? How are the white lines related? I think you are getting away from the topic though. Where is the evidence of geoengineering? How are the white lines related?

]]>