Comments on: Persisting and Spreading Contrails http://contrailscience.com/persisting-and-spreading-contrails/ The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:04:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tryblinkinghttp://contrailscience.com/persisting-and-spreading-contrails/comment-page-7/#comment-85733 tryblinking Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:39:27 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=12#comment-85733 I really wish people would read the site before they post what's already been debunked and explained. Uncinus, I'll join the chorus; to continue repeating the same scientific facts to these people, you have the patience of a saint. I really wish people would read the site before they post what’s already been debunked and explained.

Uncinus, I’ll join the chorus; to continue repeating the same scientific facts to these people, you have the patience of a saint.

]]> By: Jamayhttp://contrailscience.com/persisting-and-spreading-contrails/comment-page-7/#comment-84620 Jamay Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:33:45 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=12#comment-84620 Thanks Uncinus, I'll take a closer look. Thanks for taking the time to respond. Thanks Uncinus,

I’ll take a closer look. Thanks for taking the time to respond.

]]> By: Uncinushttp://contrailscience.com/persisting-and-spreading-contrails/comment-page-7/#comment-84615 Uncinus Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:17:19 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=12#comment-84615 This post here divides the site up into areas on interest, such as photos, or chemical tests. Please check there, or do a search, before posting more evidence. http://contrailscience.com/how-to-debunk-chemtrails/ This post here divides the site up into areas on interest, such as photos, or chemical tests. Please check there, or do a search, before posting more evidence.

http://contrailscience.com/how-to-debunk-chemtrails/

]]> By: Uncinushttp://contrailscience.com/persisting-and-spreading-contrails/comment-page-7/#comment-84614 Uncinus Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:13:46 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=12#comment-84614 Bill Nichols did not find elevated level of barium. They read the units wrong. He found levels well below EPA limits, see: http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/ That video was a hoax. It shows a KC-10 leaving an aerodynamic contrail, see: http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/ Perhaps you might like to have a look around this site? Bill Nichols did not find elevated level of barium. They read the units wrong. He found levels well below EPA limits, see:

http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/

That video was a hoax. It shows a KC-10 leaving an aerodynamic contrail, see:

http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/

Perhaps you might like to have a look around this site?

]]> By: Jamayhttp://contrailscience.com/persisting-and-spreading-contrails/comment-page-7/#comment-84613 Jamay Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:08:09 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=12#comment-84613 Thank you again for your response. I had to dig a little further to dig up a "citizen test" that had some merit and came across a news report from News 12 Arkansas. Bill Nichols, a concerned citizen contacted the station who had his samples tested and found levels of Barium 3 times higher than the EPA recommended safe levels. While it can always be argued, as they due in the piece that "determining the source is always a problem", this is just another in a very long line of coincidences that keep educated people like me wondering. I've included a link to the piece below: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiJ_R8JVpi4&feature=related While looking, I also came across this piece which is supposedly taken by air-force pilots. While I do not necessarily see nozzles and turbo fans, I only see two jet turbines. The spray coming from the back of the wings is coming from areas where there are no engines. I could really use an explanation here as well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0SNTIlB03s Thank you again for your response.

I had to dig a little further to dig up a “citizen test” that had some merit and came across a news report from News 12 Arkansas. Bill Nichols, a concerned citizen contacted the station who had his samples tested and found levels of Barium 3 times higher than the EPA recommended safe levels. While it can always be argued, as they due in the piece that “determining the source is always a problem”, this is just another in a very long line of coincidences that keep educated people like me wondering.
I’ve included a link to the piece below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiJ_R8JVpi4&feature=related

While looking, I also came across this piece which is supposedly taken by air-force pilots. While I do not necessarily see nozzles and turbo fans, I only see two jet turbines. The spray coming from the back of the wings is coming from areas where there are no engines. I could really use an explanation here as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0SNTIlB03s

]]>