I do recall a time though when I thought I knew the facts, or, rather like everyone else does – told myself what I wanted to hear and then went on to discover that my actions set me back physically for months. All is better now though, thanks.

Whoa, there. You’ve a tendency, and you haven’t lost it at all.

You would do better to take the step offered you. Learn the facts that prove that chemtrails are a myth, and move on to something more useful – like discovering a real conspiracy somewhere, or finding out the true causes of pollution in your environment.

You wouldn’t want yourself to be found acting as a passive support to people who, using “chemtrails” as their ruse, actually ARE posting mendacious disinformation, advocating fake potions and artefacts, and/or armed militias dedicated to the overthrow of your government, would you?

If you don’t take this advice you WILL repeat the above mistake.

Go ahead just quietly say it to your self …is it possible.. how exciting it would be and proceed with the assumption that something unusual is happening now.

I think this is half the problem with the chemtrail beleivers- or many conspiracy theorists for that matter. It IS fun to believe in these types of things for several reasons. It’s fun to try and put together the clues, it’s fun to notice the phenomena, and it’s fun to think that you’re on the “inside” of some plan. On the other hand it’s not so much fun or exciting just recognizing the truth. Plus it’s much more complex and dry with virtually no mystery or intrigue.

Why don’t you look for the real reasons behind these trails. I know it won’t be as much fun but once you start seeing the patterns and the reasons they exist it will be quite clear that no one is doing anything malicious.

I’m reminded of a line in a song:

“at age seven he imagined the moon overhead followed him. By nine he had deciphered the illusion, trading magic for fact. No trade backs. So this is what it’s like to be an adult.”

Quite a lot. Even responding to such a request is an error.

You wouldn’t be asking the question if you hadn’t in the first place “erred on the side of” – ignorance, from which you drawn a full set of wrong conclusions.

Planes have to produce water because they burn a hydrocarbon fuel. This water must appear in the air behind the plane, and does – as ice crystals. If the air were perfectly dry up there, ALL the trail ice would sublime into water vapor up there.

But it isn’t. It already contains a measure of water vapor within it – typically something in the order of 70% of its maximum capacity. The air may only accept either all of the ice crystal trail, part of it, or none of it, depending on its ambient humidity, the state of which is not visible from the ground. All degrees of humidity are equally invisible to an onlooker. Large trails are possibly purer than your tapwater because they have pure water vapor ADDED TO THEM by a factor of up to ten thousand times.

All these facts have been known for nearly a hundred years and are freely available on the Web. Hundreds of studies are available. ALL the facts are known, ALL the tests have been made.

You will NEVER find them until you EXCLUDE the words CHEMTRAIL and AEROSOL (for instance) from your search.

Until you do, you will be in the following scenario: you’re a schoolchild going to science class, but you can’t hear the teacher because there are blindfolded students with megaphones telling you teacher is a liar. They are wearing pointed hats with a “D” on them.

What does the D stand for?

chosen to disregard the actual evidence that does exist as seen in the special aired on Discovery channel and many other independent analyses of persistent contrails and their fallout. There are spray days and non-spray days. You will allege that the difference is merely atmospheric when in fact those of us making observations have noted that the persistent contrail leavers aren’t even in the air on non-spray days.

Huh?

the only “evidence” of supposed “chemtrails” is that they persist and contrails supposedly don’t. There has not been single sample of contrail- an actual sample of contrail- that has shows to contain anything other than would be expected in jet exhaust.

Asserting that a “sample” taken from the ground is from a contrail is simply not logical. It is without scientific precedent and should not be considered “evidence”.

Can you provide any source material for these “many other independent analysis “- please tell me you have more than will thomas or carnicon…

If contrails actually do persist…then how do you know there are “spray” days and non-”spray” days…

“persistent contrail leavers aren’t even in the air on non-spray days.” – this doesn’t even make sense…persistent contrail “leavers” are any plane who flies thru the right atmospheric conditions…do all planes stop flying on those days?

Please help me understand.

> And since there is ZERO evidence to support any claim that anyone is spraying anything, there is no reason to believe there is any such thing.
Clearly you have chosen to disregard the actual evidence that does exist as seen in the special aired on Discovery channel and many other independent analyses of persistent contrails and their fallout. There are spray days and non-spray days. You will allege that the difference is merely atmospheric when in fact those of us making observations have noted that the persistent contrail leavers aren’t even in the air on non-spray days.

> I may be “dangerously naive” but that’s better than pathetically paranoid ANY day of the week.
Sure, but not nearly as good as open-minded and observant of all sources of information, no matter how contrary to one’s own world view. I love clouds too, just not the linear unattractive man made ones.