Comments on: Life Magazine Contrail Photos http://contrailscience.com/life-magazine-contrail-photos/ The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:04:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: !!!!!!!!!!http://contrailscience.com/life-magazine-contrail-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-112446 !!!!!!!!!! Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:13:03 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=345#comment-112446 NOOOOO THESE ARE CHEMTRAILS GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT!!!!! NOOOOO THESE ARE CHEMTRAILS GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT!!!!!

]]> By: Jay Reynoldshttp://contrailscience.com/life-magazine-contrail-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-95587 Jay Reynolds Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:23:57 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=345#comment-95587 Brian is already half way to understanding that atmospheric conditions can make the difference between no trails at all, and short non-persisting trails. That is a good start. In a few years he will probably understand and accept the rest. What will he do after about ten years, or fifteen? I predict he will look back and laugh about where he was in 2011. I have seen that to be the case with hundreds of people. Happy 'Trails, Jay Brian is already half way to understanding that atmospheric conditions can make the difference between no trails at all, and short non-persisting trails. That is a good start. In a few years he will probably understand and accept the rest. What will he do after about ten years, or fifteen? I predict he will look back and laugh about where he was in 2011. I have seen that to be the case with hundreds of people.
Happy ‘Trails, Jay

]]> By: Uncinushttp://contrailscience.com/life-magazine-contrail-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-95468 Uncinus Sun, 20 Nov 2011 02:06:05 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=345#comment-95468 I think we should research it at least short of field trials, as insurance. I generally agree with David Keith. Regarding your two planes, did you read this explanation: http://contrailscience.com/why-do-some-planes-leave-long-trails-but-others-dont/ I think we should research it at least short of field trials, as insurance. I generally agree with David Keith.

Regarding your two planes, did you read this explanation:

http://contrailscience.com/why-do-some-planes-leave-long-trails-but-others-dont/

]]> By: Bryanhttp://contrailscience.com/life-magazine-contrail-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-95462 Bryan Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:49:48 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=345#comment-95462 Whether or not your believe chemtrails to be real, what is very real is that there are plenty of patents related to aerosol sprays (with plenty of references to aluminum oxides) and plenty of very well funded scientists that publicly advocate for seeding the atmosphere (ie. geo-engineering). You can sit around and waste your time arguing about what pictures really depict, it matters not to me. I know this as fact; on days when I do witness your persistent "condensation trails" I will at times see what appears to be commercial aircraft at cruising altitude with either no contrails, or rarely, a typical contrail (one that follows the aircraft across the horizon... in other words it does not disperse over the course of a few hours). So, with the debate over the symptoms aside, where do you all stand on the real issue of geo-engineering? I am throwing it out there to you all to personally ponder it, not seeking any reply what-so-ever, as I will not be monitoring or returning. Whether or not your believe chemtrails to be real, what is very real is that there are plenty of patents related to aerosol sprays (with plenty of references to aluminum oxides) and plenty of very well funded scientists that publicly advocate for seeding the atmosphere (ie. geo-engineering).

You can sit around and waste your time arguing about what pictures really depict, it matters not to me. I know this as fact; on days when I do witness your persistent “condensation trails” I will at times see what appears to be commercial aircraft at cruising altitude with either no contrails, or rarely, a typical contrail (one that follows the aircraft across the horizon… in other words it does not disperse over the course of a few hours).

So, with the debate over the symptoms aside, where do you all stand on the real issue of geo-engineering? I am throwing it out there to you all to personally ponder it, not seeking any reply what-so-ever, as I will not be monitoring or returning.

]]> By: tryblinkinghttp://contrailscience.com/life-magazine-contrail-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-79750 tryblinking Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:51:06 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=345#comment-79750 Also, are we led to assume 'moxaman' <i>is</i> MJM? Also, are we led to assume ‘moxaman’ is MJM?

]]>