Comments on: Fighter and Bomber Contails, 1940s http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/ The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:56:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Uncinus http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/#comment-35839 Uncinus Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:07:05 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=259#comment-35839 So it is. Fixed. So it is. Fixed.

]]> By: JazzRoc http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/#comment-35465 JazzRoc Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:16:47 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=259#comment-35465 Uncinus, I'm pretty sure the English village is called MEOPHAM, "ham" being the old English for "village". Uncinus, I’m pretty sure the English village is called MEOPHAM, “ham” being the old English for “village”.

]]> By: MyMatesBrainwashed http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/#comment-35441 MyMatesBrainwashed Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:33:02 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=259#comment-35441 Does this help -> http://www.corbisimages.com/Enlargement/Enlargement.aspx?id=HU034078&caller=imagegroups ??? Does this help -> http://www.corbisimages.com/Enlargement/Enlargement.aspx?id=HU034078&caller=imagegroups

???

]]> By: Gill Richardson http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/#comment-35440 Gill Richardson Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:29:37 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=259#comment-35440 Hi I'm trying to locate the source of the iconic photo of contrails over St Paul's cathedral in London in order to obtain the right to use the image in a book. Any ideas? Gill Richardson Hi

I’m trying to locate the source of the iconic photo of contrails over St Paul’s cathedral in London in order to obtain the right to use the image in a book.

Any ideas?

Gill Richardson

]]> By: Chemtrails | Prognozy numeryczne GFS/WRF http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/#comment-29456 Chemtrails | Prognozy numeryczne GFS/WRF Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:19:42 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=259#comment-29456 [...] widać nie jest to zjawisko nowe. Mamy przykłady zdjęć i filmów z II wojny światowej z licznymi “chemtrailami”. Jeden z odcinków [...] [...] widać nie jest to zjawisko nowe. Mamy przykłady zdjęć i filmów z II wojny światowej z licznymi “chemtrailami”. Jeden z odcinków [...]

]]> By: Uncinus http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/#comment-23906 Uncinus Thu, 21 May 2009 20:25:40 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=259#comment-23906 I don't think you can ever <em>prove</em> "innocent nature", however, Raytheon makes aviation equipment, so it's the most normal thin in the world for them to fly their test plane around in circles. I don’t think you can ever prove “innocent nature”, however, Raytheon makes aviation equipment, so it’s the most normal thin in the world for them to fly their test plane around in circles.

]]> By: Dave http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/#comment-23903 Dave Thu, 21 May 2009 19:03:00 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=259#comment-23903 Greetings Uncinus, You have a very informative website. I commend you for the patience and respect your model when dealing with those who disagree with you. I just wanted to comment on the voodoo trail. The fact that it was left by a Raytheon plane, in my opinion, does nothing to prove the innocent nature of that particular contrail, as Raytheon appears to be largely involved in defense technology. I was surprised that no one else mentioned this. I also have some questions regarding flight paths that I would like to pose when I have the time. Thank you for providing the information on this site. Greetings Uncinus,

You have a very informative website. I commend you for the patience and respect your model when dealing with those who disagree with you. I just wanted to comment on the voodoo trail. The fact that it was left by a Raytheon plane, in my opinion, does nothing to prove the innocent nature of that particular contrail, as Raytheon appears to be largely involved in defense technology. I was surprised that no one else mentioned this.

I also have some questions regarding flight paths that I would like to pose when I have the time. Thank you for providing the information on this site.

]]> By: Uncinus http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/#comment-10466 Uncinus Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:09:38 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=259#comment-10466 All trails you see in the sky "could be smoke". But what's more likely? What does the evidence indicate here? Listen to the commentary in this 1944 video. Are they talking about smoke? http://contrailscience.com/memphis-belle-wwii-bomber-contrails-1944/ All trails you see in the sky “could be smoke”. But what’s more likely? What does the evidence indicate here?

Listen to the commentary in this 1944 video. Are they talking about smoke?

http://contrailscience.com/memphis-belle-wwii-bomber-contrails-1944/

]]> By: victor spoils http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/#comment-10463 victor spoils Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:03:55 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=259#comment-10463 One cannot compare old trails with more recent ones. There's no way to prove or disprove anything. These could be smoke. One cannot compare old trails with more recent ones. There’s no way to prove or disprove anything. These could be smoke.

]]>