<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Fake, Hoax, Chemtrail Videos</title> <atom:link href="http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/</link> <description>The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Maurice</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/comment-page-5/#comment-114986</link> <dc:creator>Maurice</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:14:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=580#comment-114986</guid> <description>Just on simple remark. some logic here, where are the tremendous amounts of poisonus liquid stored in a commercial aicraft ?  Let us make it simple, at 35 000 ft you are not able to identify an aicraft with your bare eye, but you are able to identify weather or not the there are gazeous polluants realeased by the same aircraft ?? The aicraft must be spraying tons of liquid to make it visible for thousand miles at Mach 0.8 for a spectator at ground level ( or to at least be able to discriminate between barium and vapour 30 000ft above you, where it takes lab precision spectrometers to identify micro concentrations if by scientists) Where are all these tons of liquid stored...mmmh ? On the other hand if it is not tons of liquid but a small jet of poison mixed up with the remaining of tons of kerosene burnt, it is even more obvious how are you able to discriminate a few liters of poison sprayed 35 000 ft above your nose at 350 knots ???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just on simple remark. some logic here, where are the tremendous amounts of poisonus liquid stored in a commercial aicraft ?  Let us make it simple, at 35 000 ft you are not able to identify an aicraft with your bare eye, but you are able to identify weather or not the there are gazeous polluants realeased by the same aircraft ?? The aicraft must be spraying tons of liquid to make it visible for thousand miles at Mach 0.8 for a spectator at ground level ( or to at least be able to discriminate between barium and vapour 30 000ft above you, where it takes lab precision spectrometers to identify micro concentrations if by scientists) Where are all these tons of liquid stored&#8230;mmmh ? On the other hand if it is not tons of liquid but a small jet of poison mixed up with the remaining of tons of kerosene burnt, it is even more obvious how are you able to discriminate a few liters of poison sprayed 35 000 ft above your nose at 350 knots ???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JFDee</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/comment-page-5/#comment-107882</link> <dc:creator>JFDee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:02:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=580#comment-107882</guid> <description>WOW, I&#039;m one of the occasional posters. In the last few years I noticed the growth of something like a &quot;counter-enlightenment&quot; trend, and I realized that I grew passionate about voicing support for reason and science.
There are many areas where that support is needed; I chose the &quot;chemtrail&quot; issue because I&#039;m a hobby pilot and have learned a thing or two about the atmosphere.
Is there any reason why debunkers should be less dedicated than their &quot;counterparts&quot;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, I&#8217;m one of the occasional posters. In the last few years I noticed the growth of something like a &#8220;counter-enlightenment&#8221; trend, and I realized that I grew passionate about voicing support for reason and science.</p><p>There are many areas where that support is needed; I chose the &#8220;chemtrail&#8221; issue because I&#8217;m a hobby pilot and have learned a thing or two about the atmosphere.</p><p>Is there any reason why debunkers should be less dedicated than their &#8220;counterparts&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay Reynolds</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/comment-page-5/#comment-107734</link> <dc:creator>Jay Reynolds</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:42:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=580#comment-107734</guid> <description>WOW-&quot;the pilots who tell you’ve what they’ve seen were lying,&quot;
Please cite the pilots you speak of. I don&#039;t know of any pilots organization against &quot;chemtrails&quot;.
WOW- &quot; I’ve seen many planes create persistent trails at very low altitudes&quot;
Please link to a picture of these claimed low altitude persistent trails. If they were low altitude the planes would be clearly identifiable. All the photos shown so far are high atitude, though people have been claiming unusually low altitude contrails for years, no pictures have ever been shown.
This website is about he chemtrail/contrail conspiracy theory. Many folks who post here also post on the forum linked at the top of the page, where you will find some of us debunking various other subjects, much like snopes. Join in if you like. I hope you get over the chemtrails idea, because my 15 years of experience shows it to be a dead end.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW-&#8221;the pilots who tell you’ve what they’ve seen were lying,&#8221;<br
/> Please cite the pilots you speak of. I don&#8217;t know of any pilots organization against &#8220;chemtrails&#8221;.<br
/> WOW- &#8221; I’ve seen many planes create persistent trails at very low altitudes&#8221;<br
/> Please link to a picture of these claimed low altitude persistent trails. If they were low altitude the planes would be clearly identifiable. All the photos shown so far are high atitude, though people have been claiming unusually low altitude contrails for years, no pictures have ever been shown.</p><p>This website is about he chemtrail/contrail conspiracy theory. Many folks who post here also post on the forum linked at the top of the page, where you will find some of us debunking various other subjects, much like snopes. Join in if you like. I hope you get over the chemtrails idea, because my 15 years of experience shows it to be a dead end.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Uncinus</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/comment-page-5/#comment-107638</link> <dc:creator>Uncinus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:20:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=580#comment-107638</guid> <description>I can&#039;t speak for the others, but I&#039;m semi-retired, so I have a lot of free time. The web site sites on a shared server, so it does not really cost very much.
Tesla did not invent HAARP.
Monsanto is clearly real, so I&#039;m not sure what you mean there.
Ted Gunderson was an eccentric old man - I don&#039;t know what his motive was. But he was wrong about the bases used for &quot;sprayers&quot;, and I suspect he was wrong about the government child prostitution rings and gang stalking.
weathermodification.com is also obviously real. Cloud seeding has been done for over 60 years. But since the 1950 they have to take out classified ads in the local papers whenever they are doing it. So it&#039;s hardly some grand conspiracy.
If planes are always making trails at low altitudes, then why has nobody been able to demonstrate this? All the videos I&#039;ve seen of &quot;low altitude&quot; planes have simply been planes that are close to the horizon - i.e. they are far away, not low.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak for the others, but I&#8217;m semi-retired, so I have a lot of free time. The web site sites on a shared server, so it does not really cost very much.</p><p>Tesla did not invent HAARP.</p><p>Monsanto is clearly real, so I&#8217;m not sure what you mean there.</p><p>Ted Gunderson was an eccentric old man &#8211; I don&#8217;t know what his motive was. But he was wrong about the bases used for &#8220;sprayers&#8221;, and I suspect he was wrong about the government child prostitution rings and gang stalking.</p><p>weathermodification.com is also obviously real. Cloud seeding has been done for over 60 years. But since the 1950 they have to take out classified ads in the local papers whenever they are doing it. So it&#8217;s hardly some grand conspiracy.</p><p>If planes are always making trails at low altitudes, then why has nobody been able to demonstrate this? All the videos I&#8217;ve seen of &#8220;low altitude&#8221; planes have simply been planes that are close to the horizon &#8211; i.e. they are far away, not low.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WOW</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/comment-page-5/#comment-107629</link> <dc:creator>WOW</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:58:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=580#comment-107629</guid> <description>And Tesla didn&#039;t invent HAARP, okay. Monsonto isn&#039;t real either. Ted Gunderson was just trying to incite fear, the pilots who tell you&#039;ve what they&#039;ve seen were lying, this is all to much to take in. Your arguing facts- visit weathermodification.com for information on cloud seeding projects.
This is like saying to your friend &quot;Hey, do you have car keys?&quot;, and he responds &quot;No. I never even had them.&quot;. You can see him holding them. Its blatantly obvious that he is denying what you can see with your own two eyes. This is similar to the arguments for chemtrails &amp; HAARP. You just refuse the fact that anything is going on, when its quite the contrary. You can&#039;t debunk these theories without lying to yourself, and telling yourself you don&#039;t really see what you have. I&#039;ve seen many planes create persistent trails at very low altitudes, which makes me question the fact of whether this is happening or not.
Snopes is a website debunking various hoaxes- this website focuses on a single theory with multiple people working to argue in opposition of believers.
It seems anyone that leaves any sorts of comments in defense of questioning what is happening and 5 or 6 people that work for this site jump right on them to dispute everything they say. It is interesting however that you are the only 6 people in the world, or who&#039;ve posted, who really care at all about debunking this theory. You however do so on a CONSISTENT DAILY basis for no particular reason while generating and inuring costs from running the website. I see the site displays no advertisements so you obviously don&#039;t make the money for the website for that. It just doesn&#039;t seem right that someone who genuinely disbelieves a theory to spend so much money and time daily to disprove it. Don&#039;t you ever get tired of dealing with assholes?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Tesla didn&#8217;t invent HAARP, okay. Monsonto isn&#8217;t real either. Ted Gunderson was just trying to incite fear, the pilots who tell you&#8217;ve what they&#8217;ve seen were lying, this is all to much to take in. Your arguing facts- visit weathermodification.com for information on cloud seeding projects.</p><p>This is like saying to your friend &#8220;Hey, do you have car keys?&#8221;, and he responds &#8220;No. I never even had them.&#8221;. You can see him holding them. Its blatantly obvious that he is denying what you can see with your own two eyes. This is similar to the arguments for chemtrails &amp; HAARP. You just refuse the fact that anything is going on, when its quite the contrary. You can&#8217;t debunk these theories without lying to yourself, and telling yourself you don&#8217;t really see what you have. I&#8217;ve seen many planes create persistent trails at very low altitudes, which makes me question the fact of whether this is happening or not.</p><p>Snopes is a website debunking various hoaxes- this website focuses on a single theory with multiple people working to argue in opposition of believers.</p><p>It seems anyone that leaves any sorts of comments in defense of questioning what is happening and 5 or 6 people that work for this site jump right on them to dispute everything they say. It is interesting however that you are the only 6 people in the world, or who&#8217;ve posted, who really care at all about debunking this theory. You however do so on a CONSISTENT DAILY basis for no particular reason while generating and inuring costs from running the website. I see the site displays no advertisements so you obviously don&#8217;t make the money for the website for that. It just doesn&#8217;t seem right that someone who genuinely disbelieves a theory to spend so much money and time daily to disprove it. Don&#8217;t you ever get tired of dealing with assholes?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
