<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contrails In the Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/</link>
	<description>The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uncinus</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44020</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44020</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
it doesnt mean anything other than I’d say its very relevant to “contrail science”.

And Uncinus, I assume you’re suggesting hydrogen airplanes?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hydrogen planes would be great in terms of lack of pollution, however they would probably increase cloud cover more than regular jets.  That could be mitigated by altering the flight altitude if it were a serious problem.

I&#039;m also in favor of the Trimaran ocean salt spraying approach, if such a thing ever becomes necessary.  Ideally we would avoid such a need.

&lt;img src=&quot;http://contrailscience.com/skitch/morton.jpg_%28580%C3%97435%29-20100318-175221.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/6354759.stm

But the key point that this site is making is all about evidence.  Is there any actual evidence that anything like this is going on?  Anyone seen any inexplicably odd trimarans?  Anyone seen any inexplicably odd contrails?

And if they were going to do it, why would they do it in secret?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
it doesnt mean anything other than I’d say its very relevant to “contrail science”.</p>
<p>And Uncinus, I assume you’re suggesting hydrogen airplanes?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hydrogen planes would be great in terms of lack of pollution, however they would probably increase cloud cover more than regular jets.  That could be mitigated by altering the flight altitude if it were a serious problem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also in favor of the Trimaran ocean salt spraying approach, if such a thing ever becomes necessary.  Ideally we would avoid such a need.</p>
<p><img src="http://contrailscience.com/skitch/morton.jpg_%28580%C3%97435%29-20100318-175221.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/6354759.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/6354759.stm</a></p>
<p>But the key point that this site is making is all about evidence.  Is there any actual evidence that anything like this is going on?  Anyone seen any inexplicably odd trimarans?  Anyone seen any inexplicably odd contrails?</p>
<p>And if they were going to do it, why would they do it in secret?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JazzRoc</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44018</link>
		<dc:creator>JazzRoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44018</guid>
		<description>ctyforg: &lt;blockquote&gt;it doesnt mean anything other than I’d say its very relevant to “contrail science”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It&#039;s an interesting idea.
It has all of the virtues (assuming it works and the quantities are correct) and none of the vices of the competing &quot;geoengineering&quot; proposals. In fact it has no vices at all.
If ever it becomes necessary to use geoengineering to mitigate the consequences of global warming then I hope Salter&#039;s Trimarans are used first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ctyforg:<br />
<blockquote>it doesnt mean anything other than I’d say its very relevant to “contrail science”.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting idea.<br />
It has all of the virtues (assuming it works and the quantities are correct) and none of the vices of the competing &#8220;geoengineering&#8221; proposals. In fact it has no vices at all.<br />
If ever it becomes necessary to use geoengineering to mitigate the consequences of global warming then I hope Salter&#8217;s Trimarans are used first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captfitch</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44011</link>
		<dc:creator>captfitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44011</guid>
		<description>That was my comment and I agree- very relevent.  And my comment was meant to be tongue-in-cheek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my comment and I agree- very relevent.  And my comment was meant to be tongue-in-cheek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctyforg</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44007</link>
		<dc:creator>ctyforg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44007</guid>
		<description>it doesnt mean anything other than I&#039;d say its very relevant to &quot;contrail science&quot;.

And Uncinus, I assume you&#039;re suggesting hydrogen airplanes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it doesnt mean anything other than I&#8217;d say its very relevant to &#8220;contrail science&#8221;.</p>
<p>And Uncinus, I assume you&#8217;re suggesting hydrogen airplanes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JazzRoc</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44004</link>
		<dc:creator>JazzRoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44004</guid>
		<description>CTYF: &lt;blockquote&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg7J8P-uXqM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
What does this actually &lt;i&gt;mean&lt;/i&gt; to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CTYF:<br />
<blockquote><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg7J8P-uXqM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg7J8P-uXqM</a></p></blockquote>
<p>What does this actually <i>mean</i> to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captfitch</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44002</link>
		<dc:creator>captfitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-44002</guid>
		<description>That was a good video.  I think it would be better if you could accomplish this with an existing vehicle instead of building all new vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a good video.  I think it would be better if you could accomplish this with an existing vehicle instead of building all new vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctyforg</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-43993</link>
		<dc:creator>ctyforg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-43993</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg7J8P-uXqM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg7J8P-uXqM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg7J8P-uXqM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyMatesBrainwashed</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-43937</link>
		<dc:creator>MyMatesBrainwashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-43937</guid>
		<description>From the film Patton. Made in 1970, I believe.

Dunno how image tags work here so I&#039;m just gonna post a link. Feel free to edit it to look all tidy, like.

http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/7951/700756d18ecd.jpg
&lt;img src=&quot;http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/7951/700756d18ecd.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the film Patton. Made in 1970, I believe.</p>
<p>Dunno how image tags work here so I&#8217;m just gonna post a link. Feel free to edit it to look all tidy, like.</p>
<p><a href="http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/7951/700756d18ecd.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/7951/700756d18ecd.jpg</a><br />
<img src="http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/7951/700756d18ecd.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncinus</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-43936</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-43936</guid>
		<description>I think we need to be a bit more specific here.  Using terms like &quot;rare&quot; and &quot;very often&quot; might mean different things to different people.

I said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;It was though, a rather unusual day. It’s very rare to see such a profusion of contrails. Maybe 2-3 times a year. As it has always been.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now that&#039;s very specific.  2-3 times a year have the high degree of contrail cover that march 5th 2010 had. It was a VERY high frequency contrail day. 

There are obviously days that have LESS contrail cover, but still have persistent contrail cover.   

Days with contrail cover happen more frequently in the winter. 

What do you mean by &quot;very often&quot;?  50% of days?  10%?  90%?  All year round?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need to be a bit more specific here.  Using terms like &#8220;rare&#8221; and &#8220;very often&#8221; might mean different things to different people.</p>
<p>I said:</p>
<blockquote><p>It was though, a rather unusual day. It’s very rare to see such a profusion of contrails. Maybe 2-3 times a year. As it has always been.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now that&#8217;s very specific.  2-3 times a year have the high degree of contrail cover that march 5th 2010 had. It was a VERY high frequency contrail day. </p>
<p>There are obviously days that have LESS contrail cover, but still have persistent contrail cover.   </p>
<p>Days with contrail cover happen more frequently in the winter. </p>
<p>What do you mean by &#8220;very often&#8221;?  50% of days?  10%?  90%?  All year round?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTYForg</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-43935</link>
		<dc:creator>CTYForg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrails-in-the-movies/#comment-43935</guid>
		<description>LOS ANGELES, CA
both March 12th, 15th and 16th,
 2010 have ALL had persistent contrail cover.

Not rare, this happens very often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOS ANGELES, CA<br />
both March 12th, 15th and 16th,<br />
 2010 have ALL had persistent contrail cover.</p>
<p>Not rare, this happens very often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
