<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Contrail photos through history</title> <atom:link href="http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/</link> <description>The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-4/#comment-98050</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:27:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-98050</guid> <description>I too have noticed an apparent change in the sky as related to Contrails left behind from aircraft, but after thinking about it and being a private pilot, and aircraft enthusiest, It may just be possible that new aircraft are much larger then before, and have much more powerfull engines, the thrust of a jet in the 70&#039;s was perhaps only 10 to 20,000 Lbs at best, some of todays new engines exceed 100,000 Lbs.
These larger engines are bound to produce much larger contrails.
Also in respect to seeing more planes fly near clouds, even the largest airlines will fly around a building cloud formation, especially a thunder storm, (towering cumullus), and will seem to be more concentrated, there is a great deal of turbulence and potential distructive forces inside these clouds so planes will avoid them</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have noticed an apparent change in the sky as related to Contrails left behind from aircraft, but after thinking about it and being a private pilot, and aircraft enthusiest, It may just be possible that new aircraft are much larger then before, and have much more powerfull engines, the thrust of a jet in the 70&#8242;s was perhaps only 10 to 20,000 Lbs at best, some of todays new engines exceed 100,000 Lbs.<br
/> These larger engines are bound to produce much larger contrails.<br
/> Also in respect to seeing more planes fly near clouds, even the largest airlines will fly around a building cloud formation, especially a thunder storm, (towering cumullus), and will seem to be more concentrated, there is a great deal of turbulence and potential distructive forces inside these clouds so planes will avoid them</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: captfiatch</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-4/#comment-92016</link> <dc:creator>captfiatch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:34:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-92016</guid> <description>I would further suggest  that if chemtrails appear in old photos then they have been around for quite some time.  Either they are useless or whatever they are doing is somehow beneficial as we are all living longer, healthier lives overall.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would further suggest  that if chemtrails appear in old photos then they have been around for quite some time.  Either they are useless or whatever they are doing is somehow beneficial as we are all living longer, healthier lives overall.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-4/#comment-91895</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:44:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-91895</guid> <description>Woz
It appears that the only one scared of anything around here is you.
No such thing as a persistant contrail???
Right, lets look at this with some LOGIC instead of scare-mongering:
A contrail is just water vapour right?
A &quot;chemtrail&quot; is made of other nasties, aimed at killing us all? (lol look who&#039;s the one being scared)
You &quot;know&quot; the difference between the two because only a chemtrail can persist??
Am i right so far???
Yet what is a cloud made of???
Water vapour...
Do clouds persist???
I&#039;m sure you will agree that they do...
So hmmm lets go back to the start:
A contrail - water vapour...
A CLOUD - water vapour...
A contrail - can persist
A CLOUD - can persist.
Well i guess that looks like there was no need to ever consider those &quot;scary&quot; things in the sky, to be anything other than contrails.
If you cant tell me why i&#039;m wrong in the above statement, then you must concede that i&#039;m right.
If not. You sir, are an idiot.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woz</p><p>It appears that the only one scared of anything around here is you.</p><p>No such thing as a persistant contrail???</p><p>Right, lets look at this with some LOGIC instead of scare-mongering:</p><p>A contrail is just water vapour right?<br
/> A &#8220;chemtrail&#8221; is made of other nasties, aimed at killing us all? (lol look who&#8217;s the one being scared)<br
/> You &#8220;know&#8221; the difference between the two because only a chemtrail can persist??<br
/> Am i right so far???</p><p>Yet what is a cloud made of???<br
/> Water vapour&#8230;</p><p>Do clouds persist???<br
/> I&#8217;m sure you will agree that they do&#8230;</p><p>So hmmm lets go back to the start:<br
/> A contrail &#8211; water vapour&#8230;<br
/> A CLOUD &#8211; water vapour&#8230;</p><p>A contrail &#8211; can persist<br
/> A CLOUD &#8211; can persist.</p><p>Well i guess that looks like there was no need to ever consider those &#8220;scary&#8221; things in the sky, to be anything other than contrails.</p><p>If you cant tell me why i&#8217;m wrong in the above statement, then you must concede that i&#8217;m right.<br
/> If not. You sir, are an idiot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: woz</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-4/#comment-91811</link> <dc:creator>woz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:38:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-91811</guid> <description>what a pile of horseshit, the fact that the pictures are old proves nothing, what you see on these pictures people, are chemtrails, only chemtrails, nothing but chemtrails...there is no such thing as a persistent contrail...you&#039;re just scared as shit to admit that chemtrails are a reality, so you come up with some bullshit explanation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a pile of horseshit, the fact that the pictures are old proves nothing, what you see on these pictures people, are chemtrails, only chemtrails, nothing but chemtrails&#8230;there is no such thing as a persistent contrail&#8230;you&#8217;re just scared as shit to admit that chemtrails are a reality, so you come up with some bullshit explanation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SR1419</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-4/#comment-89722</link> <dc:creator>SR1419</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:56:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-89722</guid> <description>Oh...sorry...should have clarified...the original Matterhorn...in the Swiss Alps...ski trip...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;sorry&#8230;should have clarified&#8230;the original Matterhorn&#8230;in the Swiss Alps&#8230;ski trip&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
