<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contrail photos through history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/</link>
	<description>The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JazzRoc</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-42473</link>
		<dc:creator>JazzRoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-42473</guid>
		<description>TimeForBed:

&lt;em&gt;I see now how that has been cleverly achieved to hide the current bout of secret testing in plain sight, as they say.  Very clever these secret government types, I guess there may be some page on wikipedia that explains it all in a bit more detail in about 50 to 75 years or so.  Maybe an article tucked innocuously into the middle pages of the Guardian. &lt;/em&gt;
Maybe hundreds of scientific research papers that have quantified it, explained it, and made predictions about it over half a century.

&lt;em&gt;Can’t wait to read it.&lt;/em&gt;
That&#039;s strange, for you have read and understood none of it so far. What&#039;s new?

&lt;em&gt;Until then, don’t talk about the weather!&lt;/em&gt;
No, please talk about it. How much do you know about it?

&lt;em&gt;- oh yes, I wonder if secret government undercover agents look and behave exactly like ordinary citizens…&lt;/em&gt;
That&#039;s exactly what I wonder about &lt;em&gt;paranoid&lt;/em&gt; chemtrailers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TimeForBed:</p>
<p><em>I see now how that has been cleverly achieved to hide the current bout of secret testing in plain sight, as they say.  Very clever these secret government types, I guess there may be some page on wikipedia that explains it all in a bit more detail in about 50 to 75 years or so.  Maybe an article tucked innocuously into the middle pages of the Guardian. </em><br />
Maybe hundreds of scientific research papers that have quantified it, explained it, and made predictions about it over half a century.</p>
<p><em>Can’t wait to read it.</em><br />
That&#8217;s strange, for you have read and understood none of it so far. What&#8217;s new?</p>
<p><em>Until then, don’t talk about the weather!</em><br />
No, please talk about it. How much do you know about it?</p>
<p><em>- oh yes, I wonder if secret government undercover agents look and behave exactly like ordinary citizens…</em><br />
That&#8217;s exactly what I wonder about <em>paranoid</em> chemtrailers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JazzRoc</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-42470</link>
		<dc:creator>JazzRoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-42470</guid>
		<description>Hiya, Faith. Yes, indeed it is a good thing. A rare thing. I would like to know how the &quot;hard cases&quot; rationalize that away. (They probably just give it a studious &quot;miss&quot;.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya, Faith. Yes, indeed it is a good thing. A rare thing. I would like to know how the &#8220;hard cases&#8221; rationalize that away. (They probably just give it a studious &#8220;miss&#8221;.  <img src='http://contrailscience.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faithinscience</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-42329</link>
		<dc:creator>Faithinscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-42329</guid>
		<description>Phil, great post. It&#039;s good to read a success story.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, great post. It&#8217;s good to read a success story.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-42319</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-42319</guid>
		<description>Like others on here I made the mistake of looking up chemtrails without researching contrails fully. I even started putting together a short film about the evil of chemtrails.

Eventually I understood the science of what I was seeing. You too can have the same realisation that there is no big chemtrail conspiracy.

Look for the following..

You will often see what you are convinced is a chemtrail splitting into several sections, minutes after being produced, with gaps appearing in it as sections fade. You will be left with a &quot;____________       _______         _______ &quot;pattern in the sky. The solid sections may well become pendulous or persisting and/or spreading.

Watch a second plane as it leaves a &quot;chemtrail&quot; across the same sky, note that sections that cross areas that faded for the 1st trail also fade minutes later, and the lengths that cross persistent trails persist/spread.

What you are seeing is the effects of differing atmospheric conditions in various areas of the sky. The only alternative is that the mix of the chemtrail is being adjusted to match the pattern of the other trails, (ie fading and persistent sections) with no visible indication during production of the trail that the mix is being changed, which I think you will agree would be ridiculously complex and pointless.

Therefore what you are seeing are contrails, being affected by atmospheric/weather conditions. If they were chemtrails why would they do the sectional fading thing, and why would other chemtrails sectionaly fail in the same locations. They wouldn&#039;t. It&#039;s the weather. 

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like others on here I made the mistake of looking up chemtrails without researching contrails fully. I even started putting together a short film about the evil of chemtrails.</p>
<p>Eventually I understood the science of what I was seeing. You too can have the same realisation that there is no big chemtrail conspiracy.</p>
<p>Look for the following..</p>
<p>You will often see what you are convinced is a chemtrail splitting into several sections, minutes after being produced, with gaps appearing in it as sections fade. You will be left with a &#8220;____________       _______         _______ &#8220;pattern in the sky. The solid sections may well become pendulous or persisting and/or spreading.</p>
<p>Watch a second plane as it leaves a &#8220;chemtrail&#8221; across the same sky, note that sections that cross areas that faded for the 1st trail also fade minutes later, and the lengths that cross persistent trails persist/spread.</p>
<p>What you are seeing is the effects of differing atmospheric conditions in various areas of the sky. The only alternative is that the mix of the chemtrail is being adjusted to match the pattern of the other trails, (ie fading and persistent sections) with no visible indication during production of the trail that the mix is being changed, which I think you will agree would be ridiculously complex and pointless.</p>
<p>Therefore what you are seeing are contrails, being affected by atmospheric/weather conditions. If they were chemtrails why would they do the sectional fading thing, and why would other chemtrails sectionaly fail in the same locations. They wouldn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s the weather. </p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimeForBed</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-41828</link>
		<dc:creator>TimeForBed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-41828</guid>
		<description>Yes, interesting, so 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;chemtrails&quot; look and behave exactly like contrails.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Hmmmm... Yes, thanks, I see now how that has been cleverly achieved to hide the current bout of secret testing in plain sight, as they say. Very clever these secret government types, I guess there may be some page on wikipedia that explains it all in a bit more detail in about 50 to 75 years or so. Maybe an article tucked innocuously into the middle pages of the Guardian. Can&#039;t wait to read it. Until then, don&#039;t talk about the weather! 
- oh yes, I wonder if secret government undercover agents look and behave exactly like ordinary citizens...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, interesting, so </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;chemtrails&#8221; look and behave exactly like contrails.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmmmm&#8230; Yes, thanks, I see now how that has been cleverly achieved to hide the current bout of secret testing in plain sight, as they say. Very clever these secret government types, I guess there may be some page on wikipedia that explains it all in a bit more detail in about 50 to 75 years or so. Maybe an article tucked innocuously into the middle pages of the Guardian. Can&#8217;t wait to read it. Until then, don&#8217;t talk about the weather!<br />
- oh yes, I wonder if secret government undercover agents look and behave exactly like ordinary citizens&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-38914</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-38914</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth,  wouldn&#039;t a conspiracy on this scale require vast expenditures, resources and an army of manpower sworn to absolute secrecy for what...more consumerism, better mind control, a docile labor force? Don&#039;t we have better things to worry about? Here in Northern Israel when conditions are right there are dozens of contrail circles overhead but those are IDF F-15s and I&#039;m living 9 miles from the Lebanese border where the Hizbullah are rearming with zillions of rockets right under the UN&#039;s nose in flagrant violation of their security council resolution. Which conspiracy would you worry about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth,  wouldn&#8217;t a conspiracy on this scale require vast expenditures, resources and an army of manpower sworn to absolute secrecy for what&#8230;more consumerism, better mind control, a docile labor force? Don&#8217;t we have better things to worry about? Here in Northern Israel when conditions are right there are dozens of contrail circles overhead but those are IDF F-15s and I&#8217;m living 9 miles from the Lebanese border where the Hizbullah are rearming with zillions of rockets right under the UN&#8217;s nose in flagrant violation of their security council resolution. Which conspiracy would you worry about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyMatesBrainwashed</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-38711</link>
		<dc:creator>MyMatesBrainwashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-38711</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If millions of people are questioning the same thing as you are, doesn’t that make you wonder?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes it does.

It makes me wonder what happened to seeing something that you thought odd, asking loads of people about it, everyone saying they&#039;ve seen it and then concluding that you were probably wrong to think it was odd. I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s how it used to normally work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If millions of people are questioning the same thing as you are, doesn’t that make you wonder?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes it does.</p>
<p>It makes me wonder what happened to seeing something that you thought odd, asking loads of people about it, everyone saying they&#8217;ve seen it and then concluding that you were probably wrong to think it was odd. I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s how it used to normally work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SR1419</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-38658</link>
		<dc:creator>SR1419</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-38658</guid>
		<description>How is it &quot;disinfo&quot; to provide verifiable facts? 

How is it &quot;disinfo&quot; to point out that some of the claims made by Believers of &quot;chemtrails&quot; are in fact False?

How do some tests the British gov did in the 50s and 60s prove that every persistent contrail today is really a &quot;chemtrail&quot; ?

Torture the data until it confesses I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it &#8220;disinfo&#8221; to provide verifiable facts? </p>
<p>How is it &#8220;disinfo&#8221; to point out that some of the claims made by Believers of &#8220;chemtrails&#8221; are in fact False?</p>
<p>How do some tests the British gov did in the 50s and 60s prove that every persistent contrail today is really a &#8220;chemtrail&#8221; ?</p>
<p>Torture the data until it confesses I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncinus</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-38650</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-38650</guid>
		<description>The basic problem with your theory is that &quot;chemtrails&quot; look and behave exactly like contrails.  That&#039;s really all I&#039;m saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The basic problem with your theory is that &#8220;chemtrails&#8221; look and behave exactly like contrails.  That&#8217;s really all I&#8217;m saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert A.</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/comment-page-6/#comment-38649</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/#comment-38649</guid>
		<description>Bruce, QuoTodt and all other concerned with CHEMTRAILS.
Please understand this website was just created for the reason to debunk chemtrails and teach the public that these are normal. A Dis-Info project.

If millions of people are questioning the same thing as you are, doesn&#039;t that make you wonder? 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience#history-byline
The UK Ministry of Defense realeased a government report for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain&#039;s biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979. Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told. 
While details of some secret trials have emerged in recent years, the 60-page report reveals new information about more than 100 covert experiments. 

Do you really think that our current government would tell you they are testing on you? Seriously. They would rather create dis info agents just like this website to educate the people on CHEMTRAILS they call contrails. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, QuoTodt and all other concerned with CHEMTRAILS.<br />
Please understand this website was just created for the reason to debunk chemtrails and teach the public that these are normal. A Dis-Info project.</p>
<p>If millions of people are questioning the same thing as you are, doesn&#8217;t that make you wonder? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience#history-byline" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience#history-byline</a><br />
The UK Ministry of Defense realeased a government report for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain&#8217;s biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979. Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told.<br />
While details of some secret trials have emerged in recent years, the 60-page report reveals new information about more than 100 covert experiments. </p>
<p>Do you really think that our current government would tell you they are testing on you? Seriously. They would rather create dis info agents just like this website to educate the people on CHEMTRAILS they call contrails. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
