Comments on: “Chemtrail” Aircraft Photos

By: LightBearer

LightBearer — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:23:38 +0000

I have been away for a while so apologies for not replying sooner. Thanks very much for the topics you highlighted for me, very fascinating indeed. I’m no closer to understanding these contrails fully as I have decided to no longer pursue any things which cause me to feel negative (as hard as that may sound) I will now be concentrating only on positive ventures. This may well be my last post here so let me say a huge thanks to all who have read my posts and given your feedback.

Peace love and light to everyone.

By: faithinscience

faithinscience — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:31:31 +0000

LOL!!! So, since something happened in the past, that must mean that “chemtrails” are “real”?!? Man, there is no fighting THAT logic! Where is it written that any instace in the past resulted in trails like the ones we see today?! How do you know the planes that DON’T leave trails aren’t the ones “spraying” CLEAR chemicals?! Prove me wrong on THAT! It amazes me that so many find the concept of evidence…trivial. Again, you made the claim that this site contains information that is untruthful. Back your words up! And calling those of us who HAVE bothered to learn these subjects from reliable sources, “traitors” just for possessing the knowledge you don’t have. THAT the biggest lie told in the whole “chemtrail” “debate”! Because I actually learned the facts from those qualified to teach the facts, I’m the bad guy?!~ Sorry, that isn’t how it works.

By: Albert A.

Albert A. — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:38:56 +0000

Want to know all the experimets already perfomed on you.
Please google:
“1994 Rockefeller Report”

And this is from 1994, with the advances in technology god only knows what they are doing today.

By: Uncinus

Uncinus — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:38:54 +0000

Albert A. has been placed in Moderation for failing to be polite.

By: Uncinus

Uncinus — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:58:32 +0000

“Technically” there’s an infinite number of things that might be happening. But to pick one to actually believe in, you need some evidence.

Or did you just pick “chemtrails” at random, as an example of things “they” might be doing?

Take it as read that the government is evil and would no shrink from doing evil things to the populace.

Now, given that, what evidence is there that they are actually doing something involving trails in the sky?

Surely you can’t be believing in the chemtrail theory based on “they are evil, and have done evil things in the past, so those white lines must be evil spraying”. Surely you have some evidence to back up your theory.

So what is it?

By: Albert A.

Albert A. — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:49:39 +0000

The human populous has been experimented on in the past, and you agree this is confirmed of happening, don’t you really think that there is a slight possibility we are being experimented on now and just not told by those in power just like it happened in the past.
They experimented (sprayed) over England and never told anyone until the information was declassified 30 years later. So technically we could be under an experiment now and just not deemed important to be told by those who perform it.

By: faithinscience

faithinscience — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:28:44 +0000

Yes, you need MUCH more than that! He was saying that he is interested in “pseudoscience” not because he likes posting his own, but because he likes posting examples from OTHER people and exposing it for what it is. I love his challenge to you, and your COMPLETE inability to provide the information he requested! I’m not “outsourcing your (my) thought and critical thinking”. I just understand this subject much better than you will EVER be able to. Go ahead, pretend that you have educated yourself enough by watching youtube videos to reject that VERY well understood science that explains each and every trail in the sky. As Uncinus has pointed out, YOUR inability to provide ANYTHING in this site that is in error only goes to show that YOU are the one who is wrong. Stop accusing others of lying, when YOU are doing so, hypocrite. I also love how you whine about name calling (Which Uncinus censors from ALL sides) and then you proceed to do the same thing! The ONLY reason you “question” authority is because you don’t understand the facts as they are presented to you. Don’t worry about it…not everyone is able to understand atmospheric science. YOU are the traitor/liar here pal…you are accusing your own people of wrongdoing, and then refusing to provide evidence. You disgust me.

By: Uncinus

Uncinus — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:04:36 +0000

Yes, you do. Point out one error. Your continual failure to do so quite clearly indicates to everyone that you are entirely wrong.

By: Albert A.

Albert A. — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:57:41 +0000

ContrailScience.com is just a place where I write about contrails and science – which also includes some looking at the “chemtrails” theory, and pseudoscience.

I mean, seriously?
Do I need to say any more. LOL

By: Uncinus

Uncinus — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:53:44 +0000

Albert, I’ll give you one chance to actually raise a specific objection – actually point out something that is incorrect, and present evidence supporting your claim. But if you persist in simply calling people Nazis, then I’m afraid I’m going to have to take away your posting privileges.

So: what’s incorrect, and why?