Comments on: Cirrus Uncinus and Contrails

By: Weinlock

Weinlock — Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:23:14 +0000

Hello guys. There will be no debate. My opponent evetually refused his participation in the broadcast without a reason. Probably because he saw my determination for debunking him publicaly. He is quite reasonable man, I think.

Thank you all.

By: Jay Reynolds

Jay Reynolds — Thu, 11 Aug 2011 02:45:11 +0000

Here are some other background links on the video “What in the world…”(WITWATS):
http://metabunk.org/threads/137-Shasta-Snow-and-Water-Aluminum-Tests.

http://metabunk.org/threads/172-The-Claims-of-Michael-J.-Murphy-A-Factual-Examination

http://metabunk.org/threads/154-The-Claims-of-Francis-Mangels-a-Factual-Examination

By: tryblinking

tryblinking — Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:32:10 +0000

I too look forward to reading/watching more on this debate, hopefully on a new Metabunk thread, if Weinlock has an account. (Might have to get some subtitles first by the sound of it.)

By: Weinlock

Weinlock — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:40:53 +0000

Thanks a lot Uncinus. Your work, though hard and tiresome is a heroic achievement.

By: Uncinus

Uncinus — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:31:44 +0000

If they then move on to “people think it has changed, they don’t remember it being like this”. Then you can respond with: “lots of people remember it being like this – a survey of conspiracy minded people on Above Top Secret showed that MOST people actually remembered it being like this”, and read some of the quotes from:

http://contrailscience.com/hazy-memories-of-blue-skies/