<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Chemtrails:  The Best Evidence</title> <atom:link href="http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/</link> <description>The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Stupid</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-118172</link> <dc:creator>Stupid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:58:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-118172</guid> <description>Is it possible for  Imhotech to chose one video/ides at a time, and discuss it ?
We will be willing to discuss specific instances, one by one.
It&#039;s not like we are unwilling, you see.
Or does he/she need to lay a chemtrail of videos, to cover his trail...lol ?
Pick one, and we&#039;ll give you info. then after that, let&#039;s move on to the next.
It&#039;s the most-sensible and most-honest way to do things.
(example)....Throwing a pile of wood on a fire will not ignite all the wood, if some of it bounces outside the hot-spot..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible for  Imhotech to chose one video/ides at a time, and discuss it ?<br
/> We will be willing to discuss specific instances, one by one.<br
/> It&#8217;s not like we are unwilling, you see.<br
/> Or does he/she need to lay a chemtrail of videos, to cover his trail&#8230;lol ?<br
/> Pick one, and we&#8217;ll give you info. then after that, let&#8217;s move on to the next.<br
/> It&#8217;s the most-sensible and most-honest way to do things.</p><p>(example)&#8230;.Throwing a pile of wood on a fire will not ignite all the wood, if some of it bounces outside the hot-spot..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay Reynolds</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-118149</link> <dc:creator>Jay Reynolds</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:42:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-118149</guid> <description>The first video clearly shows the aerodynamic contrails begin at the leading edge of the wing, just where they would be expected, NOT from nozzles. The so-called nozzles are flap track fairings.
http://contrailscience.com/aerodynamic-and-rainbow-contrails/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first video clearly shows the aerodynamic contrails begin at the leading edge of the wing, just where they would be expected, NOT from nozzles. The so-called nozzles are flap track fairings.</p><p><a
href="http://contrailscience.com/aerodynamic-and-rainbow-contrails/" rel="nofollow">http://contrailscience.com/aerodynamic-and-rainbow-contrails/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JFDee</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-118108</link> <dc:creator>JFDee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:46:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-118108</guid> <description>These are all very old and often debunked videos.
What is the proof you are writing about? Can you name it specifically? Not just link to long amateur videos?
Maybe you can give a certain time mark in the video where you find the relevant information. Or describe it shortly with your own words.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all very old and often debunked videos.</p><p>What is the proof you are writing about? Can you name it specifically? Not just link to long amateur videos?</p><p>Maybe you can give a certain time mark in the video where you find the relevant information. Or describe it shortly with your own words.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Imhotech</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-118095</link> <dc:creator>Imhotech</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:34:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-118095</guid> <description>Spraying program. Chemtrail Proof. Enjoy:
Chemtrails on / off switch filmed behind a Plane no Contrails - Chemtrail proof
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE8_0RhrcqY&amp;feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wshBhDlI1dY&amp;feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYG_hdZmTic&amp;feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MS9MPcUNkc&amp;feature=related</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spraying program. Chemtrail Proof. Enjoy:<br
/> Chemtrails on / off switch filmed behind a Plane no Contrails &#8211; Chemtrail proof</p><p><a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE8_0RhrcqY&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE8_0RhrcqY&#038;feature=related</a><br
/> <a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wshBhDlI1dY&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wshBhDlI1dY&#038;feature=related</a><br
/> <a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYG_hdZmTic&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYG_hdZmTic&#038;feature=related</a><br
/> <a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MS9MPcUNkc&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MS9MPcUNkc&#038;feature=related</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay Reynolds</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-117623</link> <dc:creator>Jay Reynolds</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:27:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-117623</guid> <description>Imhotech,
your first claim about the KSLA barium report has been debunked. The levels of barium in the bowls left outside for a month were completely ordinary. The reporter issued a correction, but no chemtrail beiever site ever let you know about the retraction. You had to come to contrailscience.com to get the truth.:
http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/
The &#039;Olgacom&#039; hoax has also been exposed. Sorry, you had to come to metabunk.org to find out the facts on this:
http://metabunk.org/threads/196-Debunked-Olgacom-Scandal-Alenka-Wacek-and-Chemtrails?highlight=olgacom</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imhotech,<br
/> your first claim about the KSLA barium report has been debunked. The levels of barium in the bowls left outside for a month were completely ordinary. The reporter issued a correction, but no chemtrail beiever site ever let you know about the retraction. You had to come to contrailscience.com to get the truth.:<br
/> <a
href="http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/" rel="nofollow">http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/</a></p><p>The &#8216;Olgacom&#8217; hoax has also been exposed. Sorry, you had to come to metabunk.org to find out the facts on this:<br
/> <a
href="http://metabunk.org/threads/196-Debunked-Olgacom-Scandal-Alenka-Wacek-and-Chemtrails?highlight=olgacom" rel="nofollow">http://metabunk.org/threads/196-Debunked-Olgacom-Scandal-Alenka-Wacek-and-Chemtrails?highlight=olgacom</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
