<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chemtrails:  The Best Evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/</link>
	<description>The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stupid</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-118172</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-118172</guid>
		<description>Is it possible for  Imhotech to chose one video/ides at a time, and discuss it ?
We will be willing to discuss specific instances, one by one.
It&#039;s not like we are unwilling, you see.
Or does he/she need to lay a chemtrail of videos, to cover his trail...lol ?
Pick one, and we&#039;ll give you info. then after that, let&#039;s move on to the next.
It&#039;s the most-sensible and most-honest way to do things.

(example)....Throwing a pile of wood on a fire will not ignite all the wood, if some of it bounces outside the hot-spot..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible for  Imhotech to chose one video/ides at a time, and discuss it ?<br />
We will be willing to discuss specific instances, one by one.<br />
It&#8217;s not like we are unwilling, you see.<br />
Or does he/she need to lay a chemtrail of videos, to cover his trail&#8230;lol ?<br />
Pick one, and we&#8217;ll give you info. then after that, let&#8217;s move on to the next.<br />
It&#8217;s the most-sensible and most-honest way to do things.</p>
<p>(example)&#8230;.Throwing a pile of wood on a fire will not ignite all the wood, if some of it bounces outside the hot-spot..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-118149</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-118149</guid>
		<description>The first video clearly shows the aerodynamic contrails begin at the leading edge of the wing, just where they would be expected, NOT from nozzles. The so-called nozzles are flap track fairings.

http://contrailscience.com/aerodynamic-and-rainbow-contrails/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first video clearly shows the aerodynamic contrails begin at the leading edge of the wing, just where they would be expected, NOT from nozzles. The so-called nozzles are flap track fairings.</p>
<p><a href="http://contrailscience.com/aerodynamic-and-rainbow-contrails/" rel="nofollow">http://contrailscience.com/aerodynamic-and-rainbow-contrails/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFDee</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-118108</link>
		<dc:creator>JFDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-118108</guid>
		<description>These are all very old and often debunked videos.

What is the proof you are writing about? Can you name it specifically? Not just link to long amateur videos?

Maybe you can give a certain time mark in the video where you find the relevant information. Or describe it shortly with your own words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all very old and often debunked videos.</p>
<p>What is the proof you are writing about? Can you name it specifically? Not just link to long amateur videos?</p>
<p>Maybe you can give a certain time mark in the video where you find the relevant information. Or describe it shortly with your own words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imhotech</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-118095</link>
		<dc:creator>Imhotech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-118095</guid>
		<description>Spraying program. Chemtrail Proof. Enjoy:
Chemtrails on / off switch filmed behind a Plane no Contrails - Chemtrail proof 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE8_0RhrcqY&amp;feature=related	
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wshBhDlI1dY&amp;feature=related	
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYG_hdZmTic&amp;feature=related	
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MS9MPcUNkc&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spraying program. Chemtrail Proof. Enjoy:<br />
Chemtrails on / off switch filmed behind a Plane no Contrails &#8211; Chemtrail proof </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE8_0RhrcqY&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE8_0RhrcqY&#038;feature=related</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wshBhDlI1dY&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wshBhDlI1dY&#038;feature=related</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYG_hdZmTic&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYG_hdZmTic&#038;feature=related</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MS9MPcUNkc&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MS9MPcUNkc&#038;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/comment-page-7/#comment-117623</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-117623</guid>
		<description>Imhotech, 
your first claim about the KSLA barium report has been debunked. The levels of barium in the bowls left outside for a month were completely ordinary. The reporter issued a correction, but no chemtrail beiever site ever let you know about the retraction. You had to come to contrailscience.com to get the truth.:
http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/

The &#039;Olgacom&#039; hoax has also been exposed. Sorry, you had to come to metabunk.org to find out the facts on this:
http://metabunk.org/threads/196-Debunked-Olgacom-Scandal-Alenka-Wacek-and-Chemtrails?highlight=olgacom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imhotech,<br />
your first claim about the KSLA barium report has been debunked. The levels of barium in the bowls left outside for a month were completely ordinary. The reporter issued a correction, but no chemtrail beiever site ever let you know about the retraction. You had to come to contrailscience.com to get the truth.:<br />
<a href="http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/" rel="nofollow">http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/</a></p>
<p>The &#8216;Olgacom&#8217; hoax has also been exposed. Sorry, you had to come to metabunk.org to find out the facts on this:<br />
<a href="http://metabunk.org/threads/196-Debunked-Olgacom-Scandal-Alenka-Wacek-and-Chemtrails?highlight=olgacom" rel="nofollow">http://metabunk.org/threads/196-Debunked-Olgacom-Scandal-Alenka-Wacek-and-Chemtrails?highlight=olgacom</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: contrailscience.com @ 2012-05-17 06:34:16 -->
