<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chemtrails:  The Best Evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/</link>
	<description>The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uncinus</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48620</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48620</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s already there.  The second video. 

http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s already there.  The second video. </p>
<p><a href="http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/" rel="nofollow">http://contrailscience.com/fake-hoax-chemtrail-videos/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross M</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48619</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48619</guid>
		<description>I agree with captfitch when he says &quot;That was dumb&quot; (referring to  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTAEwmrUEas cited by CTYForg).
Either that was a fake and staged mash-up video made by a chemmie to add to the &quot;evidence&quot; about how real chemtrails are. That is stupid because it is easily exposed as fake. Exposing it weakens the chemmie cause.
Otherwise, it was made as a hoax with the intent of releasing it so that chemmies would grab it and run with it as evidence of the reality of chemtrails. At least one, CTYForg, thinks it is genuine. (Unless he is playing a double game and is whole presence is a wind-up - unlikely looking at his web site!)
I think it is a hoax and  Uncinus could add it to the collection of &quot;Fake, Hoax, Chemtrail Videos&quot;. It&#039;s a good example of how well simple productions can work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with captfitch when he says &#8220;That was dumb&#8221; (referring to  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTAEwmrUEas" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTAEwmrUEas</a> cited by CTYForg).<br />
Either that was a fake and staged mash-up video made by a chemmie to add to the &#8220;evidence&#8221; about how real chemtrails are. That is stupid because it is easily exposed as fake. Exposing it weakens the chemmie cause.<br />
Otherwise, it was made as a hoax with the intent of releasing it so that chemmies would grab it and run with it as evidence of the reality of chemtrails. At least one, CTYForg, thinks it is genuine. (Unless he is playing a double game and is whole presence is a wind-up &#8211; unlikely looking at his web site!)<br />
I think it is a hoax and  Uncinus could add it to the collection of &#8220;Fake, Hoax, Chemtrail Videos&#8221;. It&#8217;s a good example of how well simple productions can work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SR1419</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48599</link>
		<dc:creator>SR1419</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48599</guid>
		<description>CTYFor- 

You are supposedly well educated....Do you really think that video you linked is somehow &quot;proof&quot; or even substantial evidence? What is the most compelling part- the taped on &quot;chemtrail on/off&quot; sticker? ...or all the shots of persistent contrails?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CTYFor- </p>
<p>You are supposedly well educated&#8230;.Do you really think that video you linked is somehow &#8220;proof&#8221; or even substantial evidence? What is the most compelling part- the taped on &#8220;chemtrail on/off&#8221; sticker? &#8230;or all the shots of persistent contrails?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SR1419</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48595</link>
		<dc:creator>SR1419</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48595</guid>
		<description>I am near Sacramento and I have not seen a contrail of any sort for weeks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am near Sacramento and I have not seen a contrail of any sort for weeks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captfitch</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48588</link>
		<dc:creator>captfitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48588</guid>
		<description>I have definately noticed the decrease with the seasonal increase in temps aloft.  For the last two months I&#039;ve seen ISA +10 to 15 in the 30&#039;s and to top it off the winds have been blowing from east to west in the Southern US which is also somewhat rare.  

Because of the high temps and strange winds we have been cruising at lower altitudes than usual and I suspect most others are forced to as well.  Perhaps this, along with the temps has contributed to the decrease in virtually all trails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have definately noticed the decrease with the seasonal increase in temps aloft.  For the last two months I&#8217;ve seen ISA +10 to 15 in the 30&#8217;s and to top it off the winds have been blowing from east to west in the Southern US which is also somewhat rare.  </p>
<p>Because of the high temps and strange winds we have been cruising at lower altitudes than usual and I suspect most others are forced to as well.  Perhaps this, along with the temps has contributed to the decrease in virtually all trails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncinus</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48584</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48584</guid>
		<description>CTYForg, I&#039;m glad you stopped by.  I&#039;ve ben wondering what your take is on the absence of persistent contrails over the past few months?  You&#039;ll remember I told you that there were far fewer in the summer in Los Angeles (where you and I both live).  Has this changed your opinion about if the persistence is related to the weather or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CTYForg, I&#8217;m glad you stopped by.  I&#8217;ve ben wondering what your take is on the absence of persistent contrails over the past few months?  You&#8217;ll remember I told you that there were far fewer in the summer in Los Angeles (where you and I both live).  Has this changed your opinion about if the persistence is related to the weather or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captfitch</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48579</link>
		<dc:creator>captfitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48579</guid>
		<description>That was dumb.  He made the mistake of labeling a switch that was easily recognizable.  There are a few switches that are &quot;after market&quot; in my plane that really only we know about.  They already labeled with a label maker and it would be easy to peel the old one off and put a &quot;chemtrail on/off&quot; label on.  Then I would make an elaborate show of how we&#039;re flying over New York with some zoom-ins of the statue and central park and then reach down and hit the button.  (actually turning the aft baggage heat on).  To top it all off I would then get some shots of the other guy wearing his O2 mask making it look like he was trying to avoid breathing anything it.  

Obviously those guys were total amateur film makers.  Probably because they were from Europe (j/k)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was dumb.  He made the mistake of labeling a switch that was easily recognizable.  There are a few switches that are &#8220;after market&#8221; in my plane that really only we know about.  They already labeled with a label maker and it would be easy to peel the old one off and put a &#8220;chemtrail on/off&#8221; label on.  Then I would make an elaborate show of how we&#8217;re flying over New York with some zoom-ins of the statue and central park and then reach down and hit the button.  (actually turning the aft baggage heat on).  To top it all off I would then get some shots of the other guy wearing his O2 mask making it look like he was trying to avoid breathing anything it.  </p>
<p>Obviously those guys were total amateur film makers.  Probably because they were from Europe (j/k)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross M</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 07:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48570</guid>
		<description>@CTYForg
Someone called Ryan198416 comment on that video 3 weeks ago (2 thumbs up) and said, 
&quot;LMAO!!! chemtards. I love the &quot;chemtrail on/off&quot; sticker over the FOOTWARMING﻿ on/off switch!!!! dumb fucks&quot;

So there is your explanation. A staged switch on/switch off using a bodged cockpit panel, mashed up with some actual genuine video of contrails taken from probably many different flights. 

Could you confirm that you think it&#039;s all genuine chemtrail &quot;footage&quot; from a single flight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CTYForg<br />
Someone called Ryan198416 comment on that video 3 weeks ago (2 thumbs up) and said,<br />
&#8220;LMAO!!! chemtards. I love the &#8220;chemtrail on/off&#8221; sticker over the FOOTWARMING﻿ on/off switch!!!! dumb fucks&#8221;</p>
<p>So there is your explanation. A staged switch on/switch off using a bodged cockpit panel, mashed up with some actual genuine video of contrails taken from probably many different flights. </p>
<p>Could you confirm that you think it&#8217;s all genuine chemtrail &#8220;footage&#8221; from a single flight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTYForg</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48569</link>
		<dc:creator>CTYForg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 07:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48569</guid>
		<description>explain this you bozos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTAEwmrUEas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>explain this you bozos.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTAEwmrUEas" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTAEwmrUEas</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SR1419</title>
		<link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrails-the-best-evidence/#comment-48562</link>
		<dc:creator>SR1419</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=475#comment-48562</guid>
		<description>I think he is trying to show that it can&#039;t be an aerodynamic contrail? not really sure...&quot;wing tip&quot;? 

birefringence? I think he is confused with iridescence...

not sure...I don&#039;t think he is either...I think he is scrambling in light of all the logic, reason and evidence that show his &quot;proof&quot; to be nothing of the sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he is trying to show that it can&#8217;t be an aerodynamic contrail? not really sure&#8230;&#8221;wing tip&#8221;? </p>
<p>birefringence? I think he is confused with iridescence&#8230;</p>
<p>not sure&#8230;I don&#8217;t think he is either&#8230;I think he is scrambling in light of all the logic, reason and evidence that show his &#8220;proof&#8221; to be nothing of the sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
