<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Chemtrail Plausibility Study</title> <atom:link href="http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-plausibility-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-plausibility-study/</link> <description>The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Uncinus</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-plausibility-study/comment-page-3/#comment-61345</link> <dc:creator>Uncinus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=424#comment-61345</guid> <description>But area 51 demonstrably does exist. You can see it on a map, you can visit it, nobody denies it exists (although they dispute the name), and there&#039;s lots of documentation about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_51
Chemtrails, on the other hand, have no evidence backing their existence.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But area 51 demonstrably does exist. You can see it on a map, you can visit it, nobody denies it exists (although they dispute the name), and there&#8217;s lots of documentation about it:</p><p><a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_51" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_51</a></p><p>Chemtrails, on the other hand, have no evidence backing their existence.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lex</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-plausibility-study/comment-page-3/#comment-61344</link> <dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:01:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=424#comment-61344</guid> <description>Stupid reasoning, if I use the same I can say Area 51 doesn&#039;t exist, gimme a break.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid reasoning, if I use the same I can say Area 51 doesn&#8217;t exist, gimme a break.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Janet Detwiler</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-plausibility-study/comment-page-3/#comment-58287</link> <dc:creator>Janet Detwiler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:49:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=424#comment-58287</guid> <description>I think I must be at a central hub for high-altitude flyovers.  There is a lot of air traffic that comes in from the west and curves south.  The weather has been perfect in Seattle recently for lingering contrail formation.
And of course nothing changes the fact that these are normal contrails.  I don&#039;t remember the numbers, but the increase in air travel over the last 30 years has been phenomenal.  So of course the sky doesn&#039;t look the same way it did when some of us were kids.  I am all for looking up though, and observing the awesome phenomenons in the sky.  We&#039;ve had some nice sunsets recently too, with a lot of smog from automobiles lingering close to the ground.  That always makes the lingering contrails colorful.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I must be at a central hub for high-altitude flyovers.  There is a lot of air traffic that comes in from the west and curves south.  The weather has been perfect in Seattle recently for lingering contrail formation.</p><p>And of course nothing changes the fact that these are normal contrails.  I don&#8217;t remember the numbers, but the increase in air travel over the last 30 years has been phenomenal.  So of course the sky doesn&#8217;t look the same way it did when some of us were kids.  I am all for looking up though, and observing the awesome phenomenons in the sky.  We&#8217;ve had some nice sunsets recently too, with a lot of smog from automobiles lingering close to the ground.  That always makes the lingering contrails colorful.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Uncinus</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-plausibility-study/comment-page-3/#comment-58279</link> <dc:creator>Uncinus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:24:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=424#comment-58279</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt; they used to put lead in gasoline, so maybe that could be why the trails aren ‘t dissapating at a quick rate remember the old days, going to the beach on a nice sunny day, and a small piper cup plane with a little red flag and some contrail advertisement like to buy coppertone or whatever? it would disappear in less than five minutes, or three minutes. poof! these are not like that. these clouds hang there. they are different. the shapes of the clouds, for example,&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That sounds like you are talking about different things. A &quot;skywriting&quot; plane uses smoke. A regular contrail is actually a cloud - made from condensed, and usually frozen, water vapor. It lasts and behaves pretty much like a regular cloud. Meaning if conditions are right it can last for hours, and even spread out.
&lt;blockquote&gt;contrails were just straight lines when i was young . now they twist and have designs,&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Like what? Most contrails are straight lines, because planes mostly fly in straight lines. If a plane does not, then then then contrail will not. In addition a contrail can be twisted and blown about by wake eddies and the wind.
Nothing has actually changed. You are just paying more attention to contrails, so you see more of that variability.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> they used to put lead in gasoline, so maybe that could be why the trails aren ‘t dissapating at a quick rate remember the old days, going to the beach on a nice sunny day, and a small piper cup plane with a little red flag and some contrail advertisement like to buy coppertone or whatever? it would disappear in less than five minutes, or three minutes. poof! these are not like that. these clouds hang there. they are different. the shapes of the clouds, for example,</p></blockquote><p>That sounds like you are talking about different things. A &#8220;skywriting&#8221; plane uses smoke. A regular contrail is actually a cloud &#8211; made from condensed, and usually frozen, water vapor. It lasts and behaves pretty much like a regular cloud. Meaning if conditions are right it can last for hours, and even spread out.</p><blockquote><p>contrails were just straight lines when i was young . now they twist and have designs,</p></blockquote><p>Like what? Most contrails are straight lines, because planes mostly fly in straight lines. If a plane does not, then then then contrail will not. In addition a contrail can be twisted and blown about by wake eddies and the wind.</p><p>Nothing has actually changed. You are just paying more attention to contrails, so you see more of that variability.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fire wilson</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-plausibility-study/comment-page-3/#comment-58273</link> <dc:creator>fire wilson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:06:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/?p=424#comment-58273</guid> <description>putting aluminum in the fuel would most likely plate the inside of the exhaust, and jam up the works aluminum melts in that type of heat , so i don&#039;t think that there is al in the fuel. and you know how your car engine would be messed up if you put something in the fuel that isn&#039;t supposed to be there. that pilot , he made sense, about carrying the tanks and so forth . but if the fuel was changed, because he mentioned hydrogen, and i don&#039;t know if that is a different fuel, to try and reduce the pollution of the past i asked him, lets see what he says if he answers, but they used to put lead in gasoline, so maybe that could be why the trails aren &#039;t dissapating at a quick rate remember the old days, going to the beach on a nice sunny day, and a small piper cup plane with a little red flag and some contrail advertisement like to buy coppertone or whatever? it would disappear in less than five minutes, or three minutes. poof! these are not like that. these clouds hang there. they are different. the shapes of the clouds, for example, did they change aircraft exhaust shape to make these results? contrails were just straight lines when i was young . now they twist and have designs, i don&#039;t like false hoaxes, but i do like to get the story true and factual. and nobody can deny that ten years, fifteen years? ago , these things did not exist when a person looked at the sky . so it is not to be denied. look up. but as to what is the reason, that is still not concluded as far as i am concerned and i bet a lot of other people share this opinion. thanks, all of you</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>putting aluminum in the fuel would most likely plate the inside of the exhaust, and jam up the works aluminum melts in that type of heat , so i don&#8217;t think that there is al in the fuel. and you know how your car engine would be messed up if you put something in the fuel that isn&#8217;t supposed to be there. that pilot , he made sense, about carrying the tanks and so forth . but if the fuel was changed, because he mentioned hydrogen, and i don&#8217;t know if that is a different fuel, to try and reduce the pollution of the past i asked him, lets see what he says if he answers, but they used to put lead in gasoline, so maybe that could be why the trails aren &#8216;t dissapating at a quick rate remember the old days, going to the beach on a nice sunny day, and a small piper cup plane with a little red flag and some contrail advertisement like to buy coppertone or whatever? it would disappear in less than five minutes, or three minutes. poof! these are not like that. these clouds hang there. they are different. the shapes of the clouds, for example, did they change aircraft exhaust shape to make these results? contrails were just straight lines when i was young . now they twist and have designs, i don&#8217;t like false hoaxes, but i do like to get the story true and factual. and nobody can deny that ten years, fifteen years? ago , these things did not exist when a person looked at the sky . so it is not to be denied. look up. but as to what is the reason, that is still not concluded as far as i am concerned and i bet a lot of other people share this opinion. thanks, all of you</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
