Comments on: Chemtrail Non-science http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-non-science/ The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails Thu, 17 May 2012 02:26:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: MikeC http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-non-science/comment-page-1/#comment-103919 MikeC Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:43:18 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=122#comment-103919 ah..sorry ah..sorry

]]> By: Uncinus http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-non-science/comment-page-1/#comment-103843 Uncinus Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:38:45 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=122#comment-103843 I've put up a post on the Monsanto Aluminum thing on Metabunk: http://metabunk.org/threads/341-Debunked-Monsanto-s-Aluminum-Resistant-GMOs-and-Chemtrails The idea is that we can just provide a link to one post next time it comes, rather than constantly have to explain things over and over. I’ve put up a post on the Monsanto Aluminum thing on Metabunk:

http://metabunk.org/threads/341-Debunked-Monsanto-s-Aluminum-Resistant-GMOs-and-Chemtrails

The idea is that we can just provide a link to one post next time it comes, rather than constantly have to explain things over and over.

]]> By: Danny55 http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-non-science/comment-page-1/#comment-103655 Danny55 Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:50:44 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=122#comment-103655 "@ MikeC I think that Danny55 knows why we do need aluminium resistant crops. He was replying to the post by ShitBird above (March 20, 2011 at 3:46 pm)." Correct Alexey. Maybe they are spraying over Mike C at the moment :-) (Just joking Mike C) ( See Marcel's quote from FB above Dec 16th 11.03) “@ MikeC

I think that Danny55 knows why we do need aluminium resistant crops. He was replying to the post by ShitBird above (March 20, 2011 at 3:46 pm).”

Correct Alexey. Maybe they are spraying over Mike C at the moment :-) (Just joking Mike C)
( See Marcel’s quote from FB above Dec 16th 11.03)

]]> By: Alexey http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-non-science/comment-page-1/#comment-103652 Alexey Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:41:02 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=122#comment-103652 @ MikeC I think that Danny55 knows why we do need aluminium resistant crops. He was replying to the post by ShitBird above (March 20, 2011 at 3:46 pm). @ MikeC

I think that Danny55 knows why we do need aluminium resistant crops. He was replying to the post by ShitBird above (March 20, 2011 at 3:46 pm).

]]> By: MikeC http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-non-science/comment-page-1/#comment-103638 MikeC Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:59:03 +0000 http://contrailscience.com/?p=122#comment-103638 Danny55 wrote: "The one that bothers me is patent # 7,582,809…Why do we need Al (aluminum) resistant crops?” Because if the soil is acid then the aluminium that is in it becomes poisonous to plants. This has always been the case, and has been noted in journals as far back as the 1920's at least. Making aluminium resistant crops is going to be a big, big, money-maker for anyone who can get it right - up to 40% of the world's arable soil, and perhaps 70% of potentially arable soil suffers loss of productivity due to acidity and aluminium - eg see www.plantstress.com/Articles/toxicity_m/acidsoil_chapter.pdf Danny55 wrote: “The one that bothers me is patent # 7,582,809…Why do we need Al (aluminum) resistant crops?”

Because if the soil is acid then the aluminium that is in it becomes poisonous to plants. This has always been the case, and has been noted in journals as far back as the 1920′s at least.

Making aluminium resistant crops is going to be a big, big, money-maker for anyone who can get it right – up to 40% of the world’s arable soil, and perhaps 70% of potentially arable soil suffers loss of productivity due to acidity and aluminium – eg see http://www.plantstress.com/Articles/toxicity_m/acidsoil_chapter.pdf

]]>