<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Chemtrail Myths</title> <atom:link href="http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/</link> <description>The Science and Pseudoscience of Contrails and Chemtrails</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jay Reynolds</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/comment-page-11/#comment-105949</link> <dc:creator>Jay Reynolds</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 14:04:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/#comment-105949</guid> <description>Yes, its a patent. One interesting facet of the ploy used by Michael J. Murphy and the Mt. Shasta Group is to falsely claim that this patent describes a &quot;signature&quot; for elemental analysis which can be confirmed by testing rainwater or atmospheric deposition and finding aluminum, barium, and strontium, because those are elements mentioned in the patent.
That is false. aluminum oxide is the only one of those three elements mentioned in the patent.
The patent does, SEPARATELY FROM Al203, mention Welsbach materials, which MIGHT have the characteristics of reflecting both visible and far IR wavelengths, yet allowing near IR wavelengths of pass back into space. The only reference in the patent for welsbach materials is thorium oxide, which is radioactive and was used in gas light mantles. I don&#039;t see any of the chemtrail believers finding thorium in their samples.
Michael J. Murphy and the Mt. Shasta group have also falsely attributed the 1990 patent to a &quot;mr. Welsbach&quot;, however, he was an Austrian gas mantle developer who died in 1929. The so-called &quot;Welsbach signature&quot;, which is said to include barium and strontium, became part of chemtrails lore through the efforts of false conclusions and a self aggrandizing hoax by Carnicom and A.C Griffith as described here:
http://metabunk.org/threads/210-How-did-barium-get-into-chemtrails</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, its a patent. One interesting facet of the ploy used by Michael J. Murphy and the Mt. Shasta Group is to falsely claim that this patent describes a &#8220;signature&#8221; for elemental analysis which can be confirmed by testing rainwater or atmospheric deposition and finding aluminum, barium, and strontium, because those are elements mentioned in the patent.</p><p>That is false. aluminum oxide is the only one of those three elements mentioned in the patent.</p><p>The patent does, SEPARATELY FROM Al203, mention Welsbach materials, which MIGHT have the characteristics of reflecting both visible and far IR wavelengths, yet allowing near IR wavelengths of pass back into space. The only reference in the patent for welsbach materials is thorium oxide, which is radioactive and was used in gas light mantles. I don&#8217;t see any of the chemtrail believers finding thorium in their samples.</p><p>Michael J. Murphy and the Mt. Shasta group have also falsely attributed the 1990 patent to a &#8220;mr. Welsbach&#8221;, however, he was an Austrian gas mantle developer who died in 1929. The so-called &#8220;Welsbach signature&#8221;, which is said to include barium and strontium, became part of chemtrails lore through the efforts of false conclusions and a self aggrandizing hoax by Carnicom and A.C Griffith as described here:</p><p><a
href="http://metabunk.org/threads/210-How-did-barium-get-into-chemtrails" rel="nofollow">http://metabunk.org/threads/210-How-did-barium-get-into-chemtrails</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Strawman</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/comment-page-11/#comment-105696</link> <dc:creator>Strawman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:11:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/#comment-105696</guid> <description>What&#039;s there to &quot;debunk&quot;? It&#039;s a patent.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s there to &#8220;debunk&#8221;? It&#8217;s a patent.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Uncinus</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/comment-page-11/#comment-105693</link> <dc:creator>Uncinus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:09:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/#comment-105693</guid> <description>It&#039;s a patent. There is no evidence it has been used.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a patent. There is no evidence it has been used.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: undecided</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/comment-page-11/#comment-105690</link> <dc:creator>undecided</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:04:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/#comment-105690</guid> <description>Somebody debunk this for me please.....
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4296843/US-Patent-5003186-Stratospheric-welsbach-seeding-for-reduction-of-global-warming-spraying-with-aluminum-
thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody debunk this for me please&#8230;..<br
/> <a
href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/4296843/US-Patent-5003186-Stratospheric-welsbach-seeding-for-reduction-of-global-warming-spraying-with-aluminum-" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/4296843/US-Patent-5003186-Stratospheric-welsbach-seeding-for-reduction-of-global-warming-spraying-with-aluminum-</a></p><p>thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: marcel</title><link>http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/comment-page-11/#comment-101641</link> <dc:creator>marcel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:26:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/#comment-101641</guid> <description>Just looking at some of the chem FB pages, I get the impression that the only type of cloud that the CTs think is real, is cumulus. And more specifically cumulus which looks like the symbols at the top left of this page
http://www.juicygeography.co.uk/weatheruk.htm
All other types of cloud have &quot;HAARP!!&quot; &quot; DEATH DUMP!!&quot; etc as a description. I really think that they just do not know how many different types of cloud there are.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just looking at some of the chem FB pages, I get the impression that the only type of cloud that the CTs think is real, is cumulus. And more specifically cumulus which looks like the symbols at the top left of this page<br
/> <a
href="http://www.juicygeography.co.uk/weatheruk.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.juicygeography.co.uk/weatheruk.htm</a><br
/> All other types of cloud have &#8220;HAARP!!&#8221; &#8221; DEATH DUMP!!&#8221; etc as a description. I really think that they just do not know how many different types of cloud there are.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
